Identifying targets for interventions to improve communication between primary and secondary care: a qualitative study of referrals to adult NHS hearing aid services

Improving communication between NHS primary and secondary care services should reduce inefficiencies, improve patient care, and provide a source of accurate data for audit and research. Using general practice (primary care) and adult hearing aid services (secondary care) as examples, this study aimed to investigate the: (i) information primary care want from secondary care services during referral processes and what information secondary care can provide, (ii) barriers and facilitators for coding and providing this information, and (iii) targets for interventions to improve communication. Qualitative interview study. Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary and secondary care staff in North West England, informed by the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations model of behaviour change (COM-B). A thematic analysis with findings mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to identify barriers and facilitators to the recording and communication of hearing health information, as well as behavioural determinants to target in future interventions. Four key TDF domains were identified as potential determinants to target for future interventions: (1) time and resources (e.g., environmental context and resources) are stretched across the two sectors; (2) fatigue, tiredness, and cognitive overload affecting workflow (e.g., memory, attention, and decision processes), particularly adult hearing aid service administration; (3) adult hearing aid services are unaware if their letters are read by general practice, or if the level of information they send is appropriate (e.g., knowledge); and (4) difficulties communicating with general practice and a lack of feedback is causing reduced motivation from adult hearing aid services to make direct contact (e.g., beliefs about consequences). This study identified four theoretically-derived variables that are barriers to communication and record sharing, and highlights how these can be translated into potential interventions (e.g., simplified coding). Further work is required to test interventions developed using behaviour change theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Public Health
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01756-4
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying targets for interventions to improve communication between primary and secondary care: a qualitative study of referrals to adult NHS hearing aid services

Francesca Oliver, Piers Dawes, Christopher J. Armitage, Chris Sutton et al.
Archives of Public Health
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Identifying targets for interventions to improve communication between primary and secondary care: a qualitative study of referrals to adult NHS hearing aid services

Francesca Oliver, Piers Dawes, Christopher J. Armitage, Chris Sutton, Nishchay Mehta, Michael T. Loughran, Kevin J. Munro, Ted Leverton, Peter Bower, Greg Nassar, Kathryn Lewis, Sobia Khan, Martin O’Driscoll
article en

Abstract

Improving communication between NHS primary and secondary care services should reduce inefficiencies, improve patient care, and provide a source of accurate data for audit and research. Using general practice (primary care) and adult hearing aid services (secondary care) as examples, this study aimed to investigate the: (i) information primary care want from secondary care services during referral processes and what information secondary care can provide, (ii) barriers and facilitators for coding and providing this information, and (iii) targets for interventions to improve communication. Qualitative interview study. Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with primary and secondary care staff in North West England, informed by the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations model of behaviour change (COM-B). A thematic analysis with findings mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to identify barriers and facilitators to the recording and communication of hearing health information, as well as behavioural determinants to target in future interventions. Four key TDF domains were identified as potential determinants to target for future interventions: (1) time and resources (e.g., environmental context and resources) are stretched across the two sectors; (2) fatigue, tiredness, and cognitive overload affecting workflow (e.g., memory, attention, and decision processes), particularly adult hearing aid service administration; (3) adult hearing aid services are unaware if their letters are read by general practice, or if the level of information they send is appropriate (e.g., knowledge); and (4) difficulties communicating with general practice and a lack of feedback is causing reduced motivation from adult hearing aid services to make direct contact (e.g., beliefs about consequences). This study identified four theoretically-derived variables that are barriers to communication and record sharing, and highlights how these can be translated into potential interventions (e.g., simplified coding). Further work is required to test interventions developed using behaviour change theory.

Archives of Public HealthVol. 83(1)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Lancashire (GB), Trafford General Hospital (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Withington Community Hospital (GB), Royal National Institute for Deaf People (GB), Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB), University of Manchester (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital (GB), Wythenshawe Hospital (GB), Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB), University College London (GB), Royal College of General Practitioners (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.