Catalyzing Health AI by Fixing Payment Systems

Despite rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) across sectors, health care remains one of the least transformed domains. This stagnation is not due to lack of data, clinical need, or innovation, but rather to persistent regulatory and economic misalignment. Even AI tools cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that meet clinical efficacy standards often face major barriers to adoption, largely driven by outdated reimbursement frameworks and fragmented incentives among stakeholders. The result is a systemic failure to deploy technologies that could meaningfully reduce clinician workload, shorten wait times, and improve patient lives. In this article, we examine the reimbursement landscape for health AI, focusing first on tools that fit existing regulatory pathways, outlining payment barriers and proposing policy reforms. These include resolving Current Procedural Terminology adoption bottlenecks, addressing integration overhead, and aligning pricing models with AI cost structures. We then extend the discussion to the emerging domain of generative AI in health care, highlighting the urgent need for prospective regulatory frameworks to ensure patient benefits. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEJM AI
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/aipc2500871
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Catalyzing Health AI by Fixing Payment Systems

Pranav Rajpurkar, Vikas Chowdhry, Nigam H. Shah, Suchi Saria et al.
1 citations
NEJM AI
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Catalyzing Health AI by Fixing Payment Systems

Pranav Rajpurkar, Vikas Chowdhry, Nigam H. Shah, Suchi Saria, Olivier Elemento, Narges Razavian, Eric J. Topol, Prem Batchu-Green
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite rapid advances in artificial intelligence (AI) across sectors, health care remains one of the least transformed domains. This stagnation is not due to lack of data, clinical need, or innovation, but rather to persistent regulatory and economic misalignment. Even AI tools cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that meet clinical efficacy standards often face major barriers to adoption, largely driven by outdated reimbursement frameworks and fragmented incentives among stakeholders. The result is a systemic failure to deploy technologies that could meaningfully reduce clinician workload, shorten wait times, and improve patient lives. In this article, we examine the reimbursement landscape for health AI, focusing first on tools that fit existing regulatory pathways, outlining payment barriers and proposing policy reforms. These include resolving Current Procedural Terminology adoption bottlenecks, addressing integration overhead, and aligning pricing models with AI cost structures. We then extend the discussion to the emerging domain of generative AI in health care, highlighting the urgent need for prospective regulatory frameworks to ensure patient benefits. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.).

NEJM AIVol. 2(12)
Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), Cornell University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Scripps (United States) (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of North Texas at Dallas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.