The SAGE framework for developing critical thinking and responsible generative AI use in cybersecurity education

The rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has introduced new opportunities for transforming higher education, particularly in fields requiring critical analysis and regulatory compliance, such as cybersecurity management. This study introduces the Structured AI Guided Education (SAGE) framework, which integrates generative AI responsibly to cultivate critical thinking in cybersecurity education and offers systematic, ready-to-adopt implementation blueprints. The implementation strategy followed a two-stage approach, embedding GenAI within tutorial exercises and assessment tasks. Tutorials enabled students to generate, critique, and refine AI-assisted cybersecurity policies, whilst assessments required them to apply AI-generated outputs within real-world industry scenarios, ensuring alignment with academic standards and regulatory requirements. The research provides practical blueprints for curriculum design, tutorial structure, and assessment methodologies that enable educators to leverage GenAI whilst maintaining academic rigour and developing critical thinking competencies. Findings indicate that AI-assisted learning significantly enhanced students’ ability to evaluate security policies, refine risk assessments, and bridge theoretical knowledge with practical application. Student reflections and instructor observations revealed improvements in analytical engagement, yet challenges emerged regarding AI dependence, variability in AI literacy, and contextual limitations of AI-generated content. Through structured intervention and research-driven refinement, students experienced AI’s strengths as a generative tool while recognising the importance of human oversight and critical evaluation. This study contributes a replicable pedagogical model that addresses practical challenges of GenAI integration. It also offers insights into best practices for responsible AI use in cybersecurity education, emphasising the necessity of balancing automation with expert judgment to cultivate industry-ready professionals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Education
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00935-3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The SAGE framework for developing critical thinking and responsible generative AI use in cybersecurity education

Ergun Gide, Mahmoud Elkhodr
Discover Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The SAGE framework for developing critical thinking and responsible generative AI use in cybersecurity education

Ergun Gide, Mahmoud Elkhodr
article en

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has introduced new opportunities for transforming higher education, particularly in fields requiring critical analysis and regulatory compliance, such as cybersecurity management. This study introduces the Structured AI Guided Education (SAGE) framework, which integrates generative AI responsibly to cultivate critical thinking in cybersecurity education and offers systematic, ready-to-adopt implementation blueprints. The implementation strategy followed a two-stage approach, embedding GenAI within tutorial exercises and assessment tasks. Tutorials enabled students to generate, critique, and refine AI-assisted cybersecurity policies, whilst assessments required them to apply AI-generated outputs within real-world industry scenarios, ensuring alignment with academic standards and regulatory requirements. The research provides practical blueprints for curriculum design, tutorial structure, and assessment methodologies that enable educators to leverage GenAI whilst maintaining academic rigour and developing critical thinking competencies. Findings indicate that AI-assisted learning significantly enhanced students’ ability to evaluate security policies, refine risk assessments, and bridge theoretical knowledge with practical application. Student reflections and instructor observations revealed improvements in analytical engagement, yet challenges emerged regarding AI dependence, variability in AI literacy, and contextual limitations of AI-generated content. Through structured intervention and research-driven refinement, students experienced AI’s strengths as a generative tool while recognising the importance of human oversight and critical evaluation. This study contributes a replicable pedagogical model that addresses practical challenges of GenAI integration. It also offers insights into best practices for responsible AI use in cybersecurity education, emphasising the necessity of balancing automation with expert judgment to cultivate industry-ready professionals.

Discover EducationVol. 4(1)
Central Queensland University (AU)
Central Queensland University
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.