A systematic review on the analysis of study design, statistical methods and statistical software tools used in South African health science research

The field of health science research in South Africa is becoming increasingly dependent on statistical methods, specialized software, and robust study designs. While rapid developments in computing technologies have made advanced statistical tools more accessible, challenges remain in their effective application. We systematically reviewed 175 articles published between 1982 and 2025 using structured data extraction and descriptive analytical methods to examine trends in software use, statistical methods and study design reported in South African health science research. Of the studies assessed, cross-sectional studies were the most commonly used design (56%), and the most often used techniques were inferential statistical methods such as chi-square tests, t-tests, and regression analyses. In terms of software, the most popular software programs were STATA and SPSS, with less use of advanced platforms such as R and SAS. The findings indicate that basic statistical methods and simple study designs are still widely used in South African health science research. This highlights the need for broader advanced analytical techniques and improved bio-statistical training. Enhancing methodological capacity can improve the quality, rigor, and relevance of South African health science research within the global context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Data
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44248-025-00083-x
Primary Topic
Data Analysis with R
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review on the analysis of study design, statistical methods and statistical software tools used in South African health science research

Manikandan Gurusamy, P. Muthukumar, David R. Katerere, Murugan Kaleeswari
Discover Data
Data Analysis with R
article

A systematic review on the analysis of study design, statistical methods and statistical software tools used in South African health science research

Manikandan Gurusamy, P. Muthukumar, David R. Katerere, Murugan Kaleeswari
article en

Abstract

The field of health science research in South Africa is becoming increasingly dependent on statistical methods, specialized software, and robust study designs. While rapid developments in computing technologies have made advanced statistical tools more accessible, challenges remain in their effective application. We systematically reviewed 175 articles published between 1982 and 2025 using structured data extraction and descriptive analytical methods to examine trends in software use, statistical methods and study design reported in South African health science research. Of the studies assessed, cross-sectional studies were the most commonly used design (56%), and the most often used techniques were inferential statistical methods such as chi-square tests, t-tests, and regression analyses. In terms of software, the most popular software programs were STATA and SPSS, with less use of advanced platforms such as R and SAS. The findings indicate that basic statistical methods and simple study designs are still widely used in South African health science research. This highlights the need for broader advanced analytical techniques and improved bio-statistical training. Enhancing methodological capacity can improve the quality, rigor, and relevance of South African health science research within the global context.

Discover DataVol. 3(1)
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA), Gandhigram Rural Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Data Analysis with R
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.