Improving Onboarding for Inexperienced Users: A Research on EV Charging Services

Background : The growing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) has brought attention to the importance of effective onboarding tutorials for charging systems, particularly for Inexperienced users. Poorly designed tutorials may lead to increased cognitive load, operational errors, and user frustration. This research investigates how different tutorial formats—Illustrated (paper-based), Scrolling (digital-linear), and Interactive (digital-modular)—influence user comprehension, engagement, and task performance in EV charging contexts.<br/>Methods : Thirty Japanese university students with no prior EV-charging experience were randomly assigned to one of the three tutorial formats. After an onboarding session, participants completed a simulated charging task. Behavioral metrics (onboarding time, task completion time, error clicks, comprehension test scores) and self-reported measures (cognitive load, engagement, pre/post understanding and safety awareness) were collected; brief interviews provided contextual qualitative feedback.<br/>Results : The Interactive tutorial produced the shortest onboarding time and the highest engagement, but comprehension was more variable, and navigation confusion was reported. The Illustrated tutorial imposed higher mental/physical demand yet yielded the highest comprehension accuracy and the fewest operational errors. The Scrolling tutorial was perceived as simple but showed higher error rates and moderate engagement. Across conditions, self-assessed understanding and safety awareness improved from pre-to post-onboarding. Significant differences in mental demand and frustration reflected trade-offs between user control, clarity, and cognitive burden. Overall, findings do not support an assumption of Interactive being universally superior; each format showed differentiated strengths.<br/>Conclusions : No single tutorial outperforms others across all dimensions. Tutorial selection should be contingent on context and goals: Illustrated is preferable for safety-critical accuracy and confidence, Interactive for motivation and sustained attention, and Scrolling for quick familiarization. A hybrid strategy-retaining a structured narrative while adding minimal, well-placed interactive scaffolds-appears promising for balancing accuracy, confidence, and engagement in EV charging onboarding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Design Research
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2025.11.38.4.7
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Onboarding for Inexperienced Users: A Research on EV Charging Services

H. H. Wu, Wonseok Yang
Archives of Design Research
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Improving Onboarding for Inexperienced Users: A Research on EV Charging Services

H. H. Wu, Wonseok Yang
article en

Abstract

Background : The growing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) has brought attention to the importance of effective onboarding tutorials for charging systems, particularly for Inexperienced users. Poorly designed tutorials may lead to increased cognitive load, operational errors, and user frustration. This research investigates how different tutorial formats—Illustrated (paper-based), Scrolling (digital-linear), and Interactive (digital-modular)—influence user comprehension, engagement, and task performance in EV charging contexts.<br/>Methods : Thirty Japanese university students with no prior EV-charging experience were randomly assigned to one of the three tutorial formats. After an onboarding session, participants completed a simulated charging task. Behavioral metrics (onboarding time, task completion time, error clicks, comprehension test scores) and self-reported measures (cognitive load, engagement, pre/post understanding and safety awareness) were collected; brief interviews provided contextual qualitative feedback.<br/>Results : The Interactive tutorial produced the shortest onboarding time and the highest engagement, but comprehension was more variable, and navigation confusion was reported. The Illustrated tutorial imposed higher mental/physical demand yet yielded the highest comprehension accuracy and the fewest operational errors. The Scrolling tutorial was perceived as simple but showed higher error rates and moderate engagement. Across conditions, self-assessed understanding and safety awareness improved from pre-to post-onboarding. Significant differences in mental demand and frustration reflected trade-offs between user control, clarity, and cognitive burden. Overall, findings do not support an assumption of Interactive being universally superior; each format showed differentiated strengths.<br/>Conclusions : No single tutorial outperforms others across all dimensions. Tutorial selection should be contingent on context and goals: Illustrated is preferable for safety-critical accuracy and confidence, Interactive for motivation and sustained attention, and Scrolling for quick familiarization. A hybrid strategy-retaining a structured narrative while adding minimal, well-placed interactive scaffolds-appears promising for balancing accuracy, confidence, and engagement in EV charging onboarding.

Archives of Design ResearchVol. 38(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving Onboarding for Inexperienced Users: A Research on EV Charging Services — H. H. Wu, Wonseok Yang · Archives of Design Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS