Preventing evolutionary rescue in cancer using two-strike therapy

First-line cancer treatment frequently fails due to initially rare therapeutic resistance. An important clinical question is then how to schedule subsequent treatments to maximize the probability of tumor eradication. Here, we provide a theoretical solution to this problem by using mathematical analysis and extensive stochastic simulations within the framework of evolutionary rescue theory to determine how best to exploit the vulnerability of small tumors to stochastic extinction. Whereas standard clinical practice is to wait for evidence of relapse, we confirm a recent hypothesis that the optimal time to switch to a second treatment is when the tumor is close to its minimum size before relapse, when it is likely undetectable. This optimum can lie slightly before or slightly after the nadir, depending on tumor parameters. Given that this exact time point may be difficult to determine in practice, we study windows of high extinction probability that lie around the optimal switching point, showing that switching after the relapse has begun is typically better than switching too early. We further reveal how treatment efficacy and tumor demographic and evolutionary parameters influence the predicted clinical outcome, and we determine how best to schedule drugs of unequal efficacy. Our work establishes a foundation for further experimental and clinical investigation of this evolutionarily-informed multi-strike treatment strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genetics
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf255
Primary Topic
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventing evolutionary rescue in cancer using two-strike therapy

Yannick Viossat, Srishti Patil, Armaan Ahmed, Robert Noble
Genetics
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
article

Preventing evolutionary rescue in cancer using two-strike therapy

Yannick Viossat, Srishti Patil, Armaan Ahmed, Robert Noble
article en

Abstract

First-line cancer treatment frequently fails due to initially rare therapeutic resistance. An important clinical question is then how to schedule subsequent treatments to maximize the probability of tumor eradication. Here, we provide a theoretical solution to this problem by using mathematical analysis and extensive stochastic simulations within the framework of evolutionary rescue theory to determine how best to exploit the vulnerability of small tumors to stochastic extinction. Whereas standard clinical practice is to wait for evidence of relapse, we confirm a recent hypothesis that the optimal time to switch to a second treatment is when the tumor is close to its minimum size before relapse, when it is likely undetectable. This optimum can lie slightly before or slightly after the nadir, depending on tumor parameters. Given that this exact time point may be difficult to determine in practice, we study windows of high extinction probability that lie around the optimal switching point, showing that switching after the relapse has begun is typically better than switching too early. We further reveal how treatment efficacy and tumor demographic and evolutionary parameters influence the predicted clinical outcome, and we determine how best to schedule drugs of unequal efficacy. Our work establishes a foundation for further experimental and clinical investigation of this evolutionarily-informed multi-strike treatment strategy.

GeneticsVol. 232(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Johns Hopkins University (US), St George's, University of London (GB), German Cancer Research Center (DE), City, University of London (GB), Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IN), Heidelberg University (DE), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.