Evaluation of an assessment measuring undergraduate biology students’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations related to career development

Improving the rate at which individuals enter STEM careers remains a national concern. STEM fields are currently facing a crisis with respect to filling jobs with qualified workers, suggesting that STEM jobs are available yet remain open and waiting for qualified graduates. While researchers have previously investigated variables, such as demographics and attrition rates for the lack of STEM graduates available to fill job vacancies in the STEM workforce, there is a critical need for additional research examining the impact of structured career development. In this article, we describe the development and evaluation of an assessment designed to measure career self-efficacy and career outcome expectations, two central factors of Social Cognitive Career Theory, and present evidence of validity in our population of students. The assessment was administered to students attending an R1 Hispanic Serving Institution in the southeastern United States during Spring 2022 (<i>n</i> = 600). Factor analysis indicated a one-factor self-efficacy and three-factor outcome expectation assessments. For self-efficacy, item-level analysis is presented and leveraged to further understand student career self-efficacy behaviors. Results support the potential use of the assessment for measuring undergraduate biology students' progress related to career development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00268-25
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of an assessment measuring undergraduate biology students’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations related to career development

Melissa L. McCartney, Sangah Lee
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Career Development and Diversity
article

Evaluation of an assessment measuring undergraduate biology students’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations related to career development

Melissa L. McCartney, Sangah Lee
article en

Abstract

Improving the rate at which individuals enter STEM careers remains a national concern. STEM fields are currently facing a crisis with respect to filling jobs with qualified workers, suggesting that STEM jobs are available yet remain open and waiting for qualified graduates. While researchers have previously investigated variables, such as demographics and attrition rates for the lack of STEM graduates available to fill job vacancies in the STEM workforce, there is a critical need for additional research examining the impact of structured career development. In this article, we describe the development and evaluation of an assessment designed to measure career self-efficacy and career outcome expectations, two central factors of Social Cognitive Career Theory, and present evidence of validity in our population of students. The assessment was administered to students attending an R1 Hispanic Serving Institution in the southeastern United States during Spring 2022 (<i>n</i> = 600). Factor analysis indicated a one-factor self-efficacy and three-factor outcome expectation assessments. For self-efficacy, item-level analysis is presented and leveraged to further understand student career self-efficacy behaviors. Results support the potential use of the assessment for measuring undergraduate biology students' progress related to career development.

Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
Emory University (US), Florida International University (US), Jacobs (United States) (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.