Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW) Is a Potential Surrogate Biomarker of Inflammation in Patients With Achalasia: A Cohort Study

Background Current studies demonstrate that red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a potential surrogate biomarker of inflammation. This study aims to compare the RDW and RDW/lymphocytes ratio in patients with achalasia who underwent five-year postoperative follow-up with those in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy donor groups, and to evaluate their clinical relevance in relation to integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), sex, inflammation and the type of achalasia (fibrosis). Materials and methods This was a retrospective study with a five-year follow-up. One hundred sixty-one patients with achalasia, 161 patients with GERD and 500 healthy donors (HD) were included and followed up for five years. The achalasia and GERD patient groups were matched with the HD control group based on demographic characteristics and laboratory variables. The diagnoses of achalasia and GERD were made using high-resolution esophageal manometry, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, barium esophagography, and 24-hour pH monitoring. For the achalasia group, the correlation between RDW and clinical characteristics, including Eckardt score, Eat Assessment Tool (EAT-10) score, the GERD-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire score, achalasia type, sex, comorbidities, and integrated relaxation pressure, was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Results The RDW values at baseline differed significantly between patients (achalasia and those with GERD) and HD (<i>P</i><0.001). During follow-up, the achalasia group had substantially higher RDW values ​​than the GERD group (<i>P</i>=0.031). Patients with achalasia experienced a sustained increase in RDW during follow-up compared to their baseline values (All: <i>P</i>=0.010; type I: <i>P</i>=0.006; type II: <i>P</i><0.001; females: <i>P</i>=0.003; males: <i>P</i>=0.948). Conclusion These results underscore the significance of RDW as an inflammatory marker, demonstrating notable temporal variation depending on sex and type of achalasia. This finding contrasts sharply with the stability of the RDW observed in patients with GERD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97877
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW) Is a Potential Surrogate Biomarker of Inflammation in Patients With Achalasia: A Cohort Study

Enrique Coss‐Adame, Miguel A. Valdovinos, Luis Raúl Valdovinos-García, Gonzalo Torres‐Villalobos et al.
Cureus
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW) Is a Potential Surrogate Biomarker of Inflammation in Patients With Achalasia: A Cohort Study

Enrique Coss‐Adame, Miguel A. Valdovinos, Luis Raúl Valdovinos-García, Gonzalo Torres‐Villalobos, Andric Pérez-Ortíz, Janette Furuzawa‐Carballeda, Dulce P. Méndez-Hernández, Miguel Moreno-Fuentes
article en

Abstract

Background Current studies demonstrate that red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a potential surrogate biomarker of inflammation. This study aims to compare the RDW and RDW/lymphocytes ratio in patients with achalasia who underwent five-year postoperative follow-up with those in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy donor groups, and to evaluate their clinical relevance in relation to integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), sex, inflammation and the type of achalasia (fibrosis). Materials and methods This was a retrospective study with a five-year follow-up. One hundred sixty-one patients with achalasia, 161 patients with GERD and 500 healthy donors (HD) were included and followed up for five years. The achalasia and GERD patient groups were matched with the HD control group based on demographic characteristics and laboratory variables. The diagnoses of achalasia and GERD were made using high-resolution esophageal manometry, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, barium esophagography, and 24-hour pH monitoring. For the achalasia group, the correlation between RDW and clinical characteristics, including Eckardt score, Eat Assessment Tool (EAT-10) score, the GERD-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire score, achalasia type, sex, comorbidities, and integrated relaxation pressure, was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Results The RDW values at baseline differed significantly between patients (achalasia and those with GERD) and HD (<i>P</i><0.001). During follow-up, the achalasia group had substantially higher RDW values ​​than the GERD group (<i>P</i>=0.031). Patients with achalasia experienced a sustained increase in RDW during follow-up compared to their baseline values (All: <i>P</i>=0.010; type I: <i>P</i>=0.006; type II: <i>P</i><0.001; females: <i>P</i>=0.003; males: <i>P</i>=0.948). Conclusion These results underscore the significance of RDW as an inflammatory marker, demonstrating notable temporal variation depending on sex and type of achalasia. This finding contrasts sharply with the stability of the RDW observed in patients with GERD.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX), Centro Médico ABC (MX), Universidad Panamericana (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.