Do machine learning methods make better predictions than conventional ones in pharmacoepidemiology? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

Authors

Caroline Sirois (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3294-7883)
Mireille E. Schnitzer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8049-9646)
F. Morin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6018-1170)
Ana Paula Bruno Pena-Gralle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-1349)
Marc‐André Legault (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6927-1210)
Lucie Blais (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8420-3128)
Alice Dragomir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3858-3777)
Sofia-Nada Boureguaa

Institutions

Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
Université Laval (CA)
McGill University (CA)
Université de Montréal (CA)

Publication Details

Journal: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Published: 2025-11-23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103312
Citations: 1
Primary Topic: Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 1.40

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Do machine learning methods make better predictions than conventional ones in pharmacoepidemiology? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

Caroline Sirois, Mireille E. Schnitzer, F. Morin, Ana Paula Bruno Pena-Gralle et al.

Nov 23, 2025

1 citations

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

1.40

article

Do machine learning methods make better predictions than conventional ones in pharmacoepidemiology? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

Caroline Sirois, Mireille E. Schnitzer, F. Morin, Ana Paula Bruno Pena-Gralle, Marc‐André Legault, Lucie Blais, Alice Dragomir, Sofia-Nada Boureguaa

November 23, 2025article en

1 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

Artificial Intelligence in MedicineVol. 171

Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA), Université Laval (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)

Openalex Percentile: Top 11%

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

1.40

DOI Open Access PDF OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.