Statistical Aspects of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Measurement and analysis of racial and ethnic health disparities are vital functions of government and academia in diverse societies, but the statistical methods for accomplishing this work are underdeveloped. Issues of measurement, aggregation, adjustment, choice of scale, internal validity, and generalizability are all paramount. Measurement of race and ethnicity is complicated by the fact that, as identities that form through historical and political processes, they are not stable over time and place, nor are they objectively verifiable. Similarly, it is impossible to specify an optimal adjustment set, because adjustments are functions of ethical judgments, not statistical criteria. Additional complications arise when decomposing disparities in relation to measured pathways, as well as in the modeling of multiple intersectional strata. The ethical considerations in model selection imply that measurement and modeling of health disparities can never be a purely statistical activity, but instead must be conducted in relation to a theory of justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-061403
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical Aspects of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Jay S. Kaufman
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
Race, Genetics, and Society
article

Statistical Aspects of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Jay S. Kaufman
article en

Abstract

Measurement and analysis of racial and ethnic health disparities are vital functions of government and academia in diverse societies, but the statistical methods for accomplishing this work are underdeveloped. Issues of measurement, aggregation, adjustment, choice of scale, internal validity, and generalizability are all paramount. Measurement of race and ethnicity is complicated by the fact that, as identities that form through historical and political processes, they are not stable over time and place, nor are they objectively verifiable. Similarly, it is impossible to specify an optimal adjustment set, because adjustments are functions of ethical judgments, not statistical criteria. Additional complications arise when decomposing disparities in relation to measured pathways, as well as in the modeling of multiple intersectional strata. The ethical considerations in model selection imply that measurement and modeling of health disparities can never be a purely statistical activity, but instead must be conducted in relation to a theory of justice.

Annual Review of Statistics and Its ApplicationVol. 13(1)
McGill University Health Centre (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Race, Genetics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.