Towards optimising and standardising donor screening for faecal microbiota transplantion

Rigorous donor screening is fundamental for the safe and effective delivery of faecal microbiota transplantion (FMT) services, whether in the treatment of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection or within microbiome intervention clinical trials. Donor screening is of paramount importance given the potential risk of pathogen transmission-a feared complication. While rare in practice, documented cases of FMT-associated infections have resulted in significant morbidity and even mortality. Despite the importance of screening, evidence-based approaches to developing donor-screening protocols are lacking. Inadequate screening for transmissible pathogens may lead to infections in recipients, while overly cautious screening for pathogens with negligible transmission potential could strain healthcare resources and unnecessarily exclude donors, who are already in limited supply. This review aimed to evaluate the evidence underpinning current FMT donor screening protocols. We began by comparing protocols from major FMT guidelines and manufacturers, highlighting their differences in lists of screened pathogens, laboratory assays and clinical characteristics used for donor selection. We critically appraised the existing literature on transmission dynamics for pathogens. These findings were incorporated into a Delphi process with an expert panel group to develop a rational and streamlined screening approach. We further emphasised the importance of maintaining transparency with regard to donor recruitment, screening, monitoring and traceback record keeping. Finally, we explored future directions in donor screening, including approaches to monitoring emerging pathogens and the potential for integration of new technologies, such as metagenomic assays, to enhance and refine donor selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gut
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2025-336532
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards optimising and standardising donor screening for faecal microbiota transplantion

Benjamin H. Mullish, Siew C. Ng, Simon Goldenberg, Crystal S. Liu et al.
Gut
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

Towards optimising and standardising donor screening for faecal microbiota transplantion

Benjamin H. Mullish, Siew C. Ng, Simon Goldenberg, Crystal S. Liu, Serena Porcari, Dina Kao, Gianluca Ianiro, Blair Merrick, Zahra Salem Taboun, Ed J. Kuijper, Elisabeth M. Terveer, Richard Stewart Bradbury
article en

Abstract

Rigorous donor screening is fundamental for the safe and effective delivery of faecal microbiota transplantion (FMT) services, whether in the treatment of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection or within microbiome intervention clinical trials. Donor screening is of paramount importance given the potential risk of pathogen transmission-a feared complication. While rare in practice, documented cases of FMT-associated infections have resulted in significant morbidity and even mortality. Despite the importance of screening, evidence-based approaches to developing donor-screening protocols are lacking. Inadequate screening for transmissible pathogens may lead to infections in recipients, while overly cautious screening for pathogens with negligible transmission potential could strain healthcare resources and unnecessarily exclude donors, who are already in limited supply. This review aimed to evaluate the evidence underpinning current FMT donor screening protocols. We began by comparing protocols from major FMT guidelines and manufacturers, highlighting their differences in lists of screened pathogens, laboratory assays and clinical characteristics used for donor selection. We critically appraised the existing literature on transmission dynamics for pathogens. These findings were incorporated into a Delphi process with an expert panel group to develop a rational and streamlined screening approach. We further emphasised the importance of maintaining transparency with regard to donor recruitment, screening, monitoring and traceback record keeping. Finally, we explored future directions in donor screening, including approaches to monitoring emerging pathogens and the potential for integration of new technologies, such as metagenomic assays, to enhance and refine donor selection.

GutVol. 75(3)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of British Columbia (CA), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), University of Alberta (CA), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine (AU), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Imperial College London (GB), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.