Unpacking the Harms of Reproductive Violence in Mass Atrocities: Developing a New Typology

Abstract∞ Despite widespread evidence of reproductive violence in mass atrocity contexts, transitional justice and international criminal law have been slow to recognize and prosecute these violations. This article argues that this accountability gap stems partly from pedagogical failures – while existing definitions conceptualize reproductive violence as violations of reproductive autonomy, they fail to unpack its differentiated harms. This article develops a new typology that categorizes reproductive violence according to reproductive consequences for victim-survivors. It performs a pedagogical function, making more visible the distinct suffering each category inflicts. By assisting pattern recognition across seemingly disparate acts, the typology helps investigators in framing such acts as interconnected instances of reproductive violence, identifying systematic reproductive control strategies and gathering targeted evidence. By strengthening understanding of the far-reaching physical, psychological and sociopolitical consequences for victim-survivors, this typology offers a tool to recognize reproductive violence as meeting the gravity threshold for accountability under the Rome Statute and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Transitional Justice
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijaf022
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the Harms of Reproductive Violence in Mass Atrocities: Developing a New Typology

Aldo Zammit Borda
1 citations
International Journal of Transitional Justice
Gender, Security, and Conflict
3.87
article

Unpacking the Harms of Reproductive Violence in Mass Atrocities: Developing a New Typology

Aldo Zammit Borda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract∞ Despite widespread evidence of reproductive violence in mass atrocity contexts, transitional justice and international criminal law have been slow to recognize and prosecute these violations. This article argues that this accountability gap stems partly from pedagogical failures – while existing definitions conceptualize reproductive violence as violations of reproductive autonomy, they fail to unpack its differentiated harms. This article develops a new typology that categorizes reproductive violence according to reproductive consequences for victim-survivors. It performs a pedagogical function, making more visible the distinct suffering each category inflicts. By assisting pattern recognition across seemingly disparate acts, the typology helps investigators in framing such acts as interconnected instances of reproductive violence, identifying systematic reproductive control strategies and gathering targeted evidence. By strengthening understanding of the far-reaching physical, psychological and sociopolitical consequences for victim-survivors, this typology offers a tool to recognize reproductive violence as meeting the gravity threshold for accountability under the Rome Statute and beyond.

International Journal of Transitional Justice
St George's, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unpacking the Harms of Reproductive Violence in Mass Atrocities: Developing a New Typology — Aldo Zammit Borda · International Journal of Transitional Justice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS