Environmental considerations for the decommissioning of subsea cables

Since the first trans-oceanic telegraph cables were laid in the nineteenth century, a subsea network of cables has grown across the global ocean; becoming upgraded with co-axial, and more recently, fibre-optic cable systems. Demands for digital connectivity mean that this network continues to expand, with an estimated >3.5 million km of all types of subsea cable installed to date, and a growing amount of now out-of-service infrastructure requiring decommissioning. While the environmental impacts have been well-documented for installation and operational phases, to date no study has addressed the potential impacts associated with the decommissioning of out-of-service subsea cable systems, which typically have a 20-25-year design life. Here, we address this evidence gap and present a first synthesis of the drivers for, and environmental considerations relevant to, the decommissioning of subsea telecommunications cables. We show that recovery of subsea cables has potential to return commercially valuable materials to the economy with a high degree (>95 %) of recyclability; however, various dynamic environmental conditions and logistical challenges mean that it is not always viable to recover the entire length of a cable system. While cable recovery activities are found to have a localised and short-lived environmental impact, it is important to ensure that any impacts are minimised, particularly in sensitive habitats, or exceptional cases where intense biological colonisation of a cable has occurred. Options for decommissioning out-of-service systems, other than recovery, include in-situ repurposing to make scientific measurements or re-deploying sections of recovered cables elsewhere. Many future opportunities exist for further enhancing the evidence base concerning cable decommissioning and with regards to the gathering of environmental data during cable recovery operations to inform future decision-making and to enhance the wider scientific understanding of shallow to deep sea environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127962
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental considerations for the decommissioning of subsea cables

Ana Hilário, R. D. Fletcher, Daniel O. B. Jones, Lionel Carter et al.
1 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
1.15
article

Environmental considerations for the decommissioning of subsea cables

Ana Hilário, R. D. Fletcher, Daniel O. B. Jones, Lionel Carter, Katrien J. J. Van Landeghem, Quan Nguyen, Isobel Yeo, Clare Morton, Anton du Plessis, Lisa Harris, Andrew R. Gates, Merranda Logan, Paul Robert Appleby, Rose Melville, Esther Calhoun, S Appleby, J Wrottesley
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Since the first trans-oceanic telegraph cables were laid in the nineteenth century, a subsea network of cables has grown across the global ocean; becoming upgraded with co-axial, and more recently, fibre-optic cable systems. Demands for digital connectivity mean that this network continues to expand, with an estimated >3.5 million km of all types of subsea cable installed to date, and a growing amount of now out-of-service infrastructure requiring decommissioning. While the environmental impacts have been well-documented for installation and operational phases, to date no study has addressed the potential impacts associated with the decommissioning of out-of-service subsea cable systems, which typically have a 20-25-year design life. Here, we address this evidence gap and present a first synthesis of the drivers for, and environmental considerations relevant to, the decommissioning of subsea telecommunications cables. We show that recovery of subsea cables has potential to return commercially valuable materials to the economy with a high degree (>95 %) of recyclability; however, various dynamic environmental conditions and logistical challenges mean that it is not always viable to recover the entire length of a cable system. While cable recovery activities are found to have a localised and short-lived environmental impact, it is important to ensure that any impacts are minimised, particularly in sensitive habitats, or exceptional cases where intense biological colonisation of a cable has occurred. Options for decommissioning out-of-service systems, other than recovery, include in-situ repurposing to make scientific measurements or re-deploying sections of recovered cables elsewhere. Many future opportunities exist for further enhancing the evidence base concerning cable decommissioning and with regards to the gathering of environmental data during cable recovery operations to inform future decision-making and to enhance the wider scientific understanding of shallow to deep sea environments.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 396
International Rescue Committee (ET), Bangor University (GB), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB), National Oceanography Centre (GB), Meru University of Science and Technology (KE), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Subsea 7 (France) (FR), Ocean Energy (Norway) (NO), University of Southampton (GB), University of Aveiro (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.