Integrate and embrace or isolate and hide? Using Q-method to understand how to incorporate large-scale solar in rural Nova Scotia, Canada
Large-scale solar (LSS) facilities, also called solar farms, are increasingly being built as part of the national transition to renewable energy. LSS can have landscape impacts that concern rural residents and cause community pushback. This paper identifies rural residents' views about integrating LSS into rural landscapes of Nova Scotia, Canada, a province new to LSS where community pushback has already occurred. We do not focus on whether LSS should happen, but how it should happen. Employing Q methodology with semi-structured interviews, 18 rural residents expressed their views by ranking 40 statements related to landscape impacts of LSS. Two distinct views emerged: LSS should either be (1) integrated and embraced in, or (2) isolated and hidden from, everyday rural landscapes. Strong consensus was identified around mitigating harm to local natural environments. The two views inhabit opposite poles of some common debates in landscape transition, including in environmental social science: landscape-technology fit versus misfit, climax versus non-equilibrium thinking, and land sparing versus sharing. We examine the implications of the one point of consensus, two views and three axes of landscape debate for large-scale solar development and associated public engagement processes. Practical contributions include prompts and cautions for discussions about LSS with the potentially affected local community, research domains to deepen understanding of local perspectives and increase technical options, and insight to inform LSS designers and landscape architects seeking to advance sustainable LSS development. • We ask how, not whether, to incorporate large-scale solar (LSS) in rural areas. • Q-method in three towns with different experiences with LSS generated two viewpoints. • The Integrate & Embrace view thinks climate change is a bigger risk than LSS. • The Isolate & Hide view favors single-use LSS set far from everyday rural landscapes. • Planning for LSS should consider landscape fit, stability, and multifunctionality.
Authors
- Dirk Oudes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-0966)
- Kate Sherren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-9878)
- Eric S. Key
Institutions
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Energy Research & Social Science
- Published
- 2025-11-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104463
- Primary Topic
- Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Dalhousie University
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada