A high-throughput comparative study of doped O3 and P2 cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries

Transition metal layered oxide materials are promising candidates for sodium-ion battery cathodes. Among these, the O3 and P2 phases are the most extensively studied. While O3-phase materials are generally considered to exhibit higher capacities in full cells due to their higher sodium content, they suffer from multiple phase transitions and poor air stability. In contrast, P2-phase materials are more air-stable. Doping has shown to be beneficial to enhance both the electrochemical performance and stability of these materials. In this study we aim to determine whether doping can mitigate the inherent weaknesses of each phase and potentially enable one phase to outperform the other in both electrochemical properties and stability. This study addresses the lack of comprehensive comparative analyses between doped O3 and P2 phases. For a fair comparison, we doped 56 different elements (M) into optimal P2 (Na 0.67 Mn 0.6 Fe 0.19 Ni 0.16 M 0.05 O 2 ) and O3 (NaNi 1/3 Fe 0.28 Mn 1/3 M 0.05 O 2 ) materials. The P2 materials systematically outperform the O3 materials in terms of air stability; and doping exacerbates the contrast where some doped P2 materials (e.g. Li and Ca) show strong air stability while all O3 materials show extreme degradation in the XRD patterns. In terms of electrochemical performance, we find that cycling between 2.0 and 4.0 V favours O3 materials, but maximal capacities are in fact obtained for P2 materials cycled between 2.0 and 4.3 V, a voltage range that results in detrimental phase transitions in O3 materials, again attributed to the increased stability in the P2 materials. We estimate that in full cells, the best P2 materials will yield about 130 mAh/g while the best O3 should yield a comparable 140 mAh/g. This study demonstrates that with careful tuning, either phase holds high promise, but the inherent air stability of the P2 phases is likely to ease the path to commercialization. • Utilized high-throughput synthesis and electrochemistry to develop Na-ion battery cathodes • Optimized both doped P2 and O3 materials with 56 different dopants • O3 materials show an enhanced ability to incorporate dopants. • P2 materials show a dramatically improved stability both in air and during battery use. • Both O3 and P2 materials show high and roughly equivalent energy density.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.171287
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A high-throughput comparative study of doped O3 and P2 cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries

Shipeng Jia, Eric McCalla, Pierre‐Etienne Cabelguen, Marzieh Abdolhosseini et al.
Chemical Engineering Journal
Advancements in Battery Materials
article

A high-throughput comparative study of doped O3 and P2 cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries

Shipeng Jia, Eric McCalla, Pierre‐Etienne Cabelguen, Marzieh Abdolhosseini, Violetta Arszelewska, Valentin Saïbi, Yixuan Li, Leyth Saglio
article en

Abstract

Transition metal layered oxide materials are promising candidates for sodium-ion battery cathodes. Among these, the O3 and P2 phases are the most extensively studied. While O3-phase materials are generally considered to exhibit higher capacities in full cells due to their higher sodium content, they suffer from multiple phase transitions and poor air stability. In contrast, P2-phase materials are more air-stable. Doping has shown to be beneficial to enhance both the electrochemical performance and stability of these materials. In this study we aim to determine whether doping can mitigate the inherent weaknesses of each phase and potentially enable one phase to outperform the other in both electrochemical properties and stability. This study addresses the lack of comprehensive comparative analyses between doped O3 and P2 phases. For a fair comparison, we doped 56 different elements (M) into optimal P2 (Na 0.67 Mn 0.6 Fe 0.19 Ni 0.16 M 0.05 O 2 ) and O3 (NaNi 1/3 Fe 0.28 Mn 1/3 M 0.05 O 2 ) materials. The P2 materials systematically outperform the O3 materials in terms of air stability; and doping exacerbates the contrast where some doped P2 materials (e.g. Li and Ca) show strong air stability while all O3 materials show extreme degradation in the XRD patterns. In terms of electrochemical performance, we find that cycling between 2.0 and 4.0 V favours O3 materials, but maximal capacities are in fact obtained for P2 materials cycled between 2.0 and 4.3 V, a voltage range that results in detrimental phase transitions in O3 materials, again attributed to the increased stability in the P2 materials. We estimate that in full cells, the best P2 materials will yield about 130 mAh/g while the best O3 should yield a comparable 140 mAh/g. This study demonstrates that with careful tuning, either phase holds high promise, but the inherent air stability of the P2 phases is likely to ease the path to commercialization. • Utilized high-throughput synthesis and electrochemistry to develop Na-ion battery cathodes • Optimized both doped P2 and O3 materials with 56 different dopants • O3 materials show an enhanced ability to incorporate dopants. • P2 materials show a dramatically improved stability both in air and during battery use. • Both O3 and P2 materials show high and roughly equivalent energy density.

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 526
Umicore (Belgium) (BE), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Advancements in Battery Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.