A Genetic Risk Adoption Design for Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders

Using a more incisive measure of genetic effects, the novel adoption design used in this cohort study provides findings broadly similar to traditional adoption models. Rearing effects were strongest for substance use disorders, modest for internalizing disorders, and absent for severe disorders. Indirect genetic effects in the father on offspring risk were clearly observed and were not diagnostically specific. In rearing-only paternal-offspring relationships, elevated paternal genetic risk for internalizing and substance use disorders increased offspring risk for MD and AUD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.3565
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Genetic Risk Adoption Design for Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders

Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist, Kenneth S. Kendler, Henrik Ohlsson
JAMA Psychiatry
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

A Genetic Risk Adoption Design for Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders

Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist, Kenneth S. Kendler, Henrik Ohlsson
article en

Abstract

Using a more incisive measure of genetic effects, the novel adoption design used in this cohort study provides findings broadly similar to traditional adoption models. Rearing effects were strongest for substance use disorders, modest for internalizing disorders, and absent for severe disorders. Indirect genetic effects in the father on offspring risk were clearly observed and were not diagnostically specific. In rearing-only paternal-offspring relationships, elevated paternal genetic risk for internalizing and substance use disorders increased offspring risk for MD and AUD.

JAMA PsychiatryVol. 83(1)
Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Lund University (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.