Printability of Bioinks: A Consolidated Definition for Additive Manufacturing

Printability is a key concept extensively used in the context of bioinks for additive manufacturing. However, the absence of a universally accepted definition has led to inconsistencies in its application across studies. Some researchers use the term interchangeably with shape fidelity or shape accuracy, while others incorporate multiple aspects, including rheological properties and extrudability, into its definition. In some cases, the omission of cell viability further limits the scope of current research. As a result, studies that connect rheological properties to printability or employ physical and mathematical models to predict outcomes often fail to capture the complete manufacturing process due to the lack of definitional consistency. This review examines literature from 2011 to 2024, identifying key thematic clusters that contribute to a more robust understanding of printability. We propose an integrative definition that encompasses not only rheological properties across all stages of production but also geometry, shape fidelity, shape accuracy, and functionalitywith particular emphasis on cell viability. This broader definition aims to foster greater consensus and guide future applications of 3D printing in bioprinting and other additive manufacturing fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c00727
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Printability of Bioinks: A Consolidated Definition for Additive Manufacturing

Matheus A. A. Resende, Andrés Vercik, Eliana C. S. Rigo
ACS Omega
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Printability of Bioinks: A Consolidated Definition for Additive Manufacturing

Matheus A. A. Resende, Andrés Vercik, Eliana C. S. Rigo
article en

Abstract

Printability is a key concept extensively used in the context of bioinks for additive manufacturing. However, the absence of a universally accepted definition has led to inconsistencies in its application across studies. Some researchers use the term interchangeably with shape fidelity or shape accuracy, while others incorporate multiple aspects, including rheological properties and extrudability, into its definition. In some cases, the omission of cell viability further limits the scope of current research. As a result, studies that connect rheological properties to printability or employ physical and mathematical models to predict outcomes often fail to capture the complete manufacturing process due to the lack of definitional consistency. This review examines literature from 2011 to 2024, identifying key thematic clusters that contribute to a more robust understanding of printability. We propose an integrative definition that encompasses not only rheological properties across all stages of production but also geometry, shape fidelity, shape accuracy, and functionalitywith particular emphasis on cell viability. This broader definition aims to foster greater consensus and guide future applications of 3D printing in bioprinting and other additive manufacturing fields.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(48)
Bioengineering Center (RU), Animal, Food and Health Sciences (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.