The effectiveness of large language models in medical AI research for physicians: A randomized controlled trial

Physicians offer invaluable clinical insights, but their involvement in medical AI research is hindered by limited technical expertise. We conduct a superiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial involving 64 junior ophthalmologists to undertake a 2-week project on "automated cataract identification" under minimal engineering assistance, with (intervention, n = 32) or without (control, n = 32) ChatGPT-3.5. The overall project completion rate is higher in intervention group than controls (87.5% vs. 25.0%; difference 62.5%, p = 9.42e-7), and the unassisted completion rate likewise (68.7% vs. 3.1%; difference 65.6%, p = 5.70e-8). The intervention group demonstrates better project planning and faster completion times (p < 0.01). After a 2-week washout, 41.2% of successful intervention participants complete a new project without the support of large language models (LLMs). A survey shows that 42.6% of participants fear regurgitating information without understanding and 40.4% worry about fostering lazy thinking, indicating potential dependency. Therefore, LLMs can help physicians overcome technical barriers, although long-term risks require further study. Trial registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06015178).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Medicine
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102469
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effectiveness of large language models in medical AI research for physicians: A randomized controlled trial

Yunxi Lai, Miaohong Xu, Zizheng Cao, Wenben Chen et al.
Cell Reports Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The effectiveness of large language models in medical AI research for physicians: A randomized controlled trial

Yunxi Lai, Miaohong Xu, Zizheng Cao, Wenben Chen, Yuanfan Lin, Andi Xu, Sijia Yu, Jianyu Pang, Haotian Lin, Lanqin Zhao, Yuanjun Shang, Shaowei Bi, Yuanrui Shang, Yuchun He, Dong Liu, Mingyuan Li, Ruiyang Li, Xinwei Chen, Mingjie Luo, Qianni Wu, Jiaman Zhao, Ling Jin
article en

Abstract

Physicians offer invaluable clinical insights, but their involvement in medical AI research is hindered by limited technical expertise. We conduct a superiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial involving 64 junior ophthalmologists to undertake a 2-week project on "automated cataract identification" under minimal engineering assistance, with (intervention, n = 32) or without (control, n = 32) ChatGPT-3.5. The overall project completion rate is higher in intervention group than controls (87.5% vs. 25.0%; difference 62.5%, p = 9.42e-7), and the unassisted completion rate likewise (68.7% vs. 3.1%; difference 65.6%, p = 5.70e-8). The intervention group demonstrates better project planning and faster completion times (p < 0.01). After a 2-week washout, 41.2% of successful intervention participants complete a new project without the support of large language models (LLMs). A survey shows that 42.6% of participants fear regurgitating information without understanding and 40.4% worry about fostering lazy thinking, indicating potential dependency. Therefore, LLMs can help physicians overcome technical barriers, although long-term risks require further study. Trial registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06015178).

Cell Reports MedicineVol. 6(12)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Hainan Eye Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN)
National Supercomputer Centre in Guangzhou, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Sun Yat-sen University, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.