Using a Mixed-Methods Study to Evaluate Higher-Order Learning in Large-Enrollment Organic Chemistry Courses

In higher education STEM programs, foundational courses like organic chemistry provide prerequisite knowledge essential for upper-division chemistry, biochemistry, and biology courses. This study aimed to enhance students’ understanding of historically challenging organic chemistry concepts through instructional strategies informed by the three-dimensional learning (3DL) framework. Higher-order learning strategies (HOLS) were implemented to foster success in organic chemistry by integrating core disciplinary ideas, cross-cutting concepts, and scientific practices. In-class HOLS activities prompted students to recall foundational chemistry principles and apply scientific practices to connect with current course content. A mixed-methods research design was employed to evaluate the cognitive and affective impacts of HOLS interventions, using a modified crossover design to mitigate instructor influence. This approach alternated treatment and control conditions between two courses, enabling comparison of performance outcomes under traditional and HOLS-based instruction. Quantitative analysis, including statistical evaluation of 3DL assessment items, and qualitative thematic analysis of student interviews revealed significant improvements in performance and an increased recognition of the value of 3DL strategies. These findings contribute to ongoing efforts to integrate reform-oriented instruction into traditional undergraduate chemistry curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00587
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a Mixed-Methods Study to Evaluate Higher-Order Learning in Large-Enrollment Organic Chemistry Courses

Jack F. Eichler, Matthew D. Casselman, Ana Bahamonde, Kevin J. Liang et al.
Journal of Chemical Education
Innovative Teaching Methods
article

Using a Mixed-Methods Study to Evaluate Higher-Order Learning in Large-Enrollment Organic Chemistry Courses

Jack F. Eichler, Matthew D. Casselman, Ana Bahamonde, Kevin J. Liang, Angie López, Beatrice Barbieri
article en

Abstract

In higher education STEM programs, foundational courses like organic chemistry provide prerequisite knowledge essential for upper-division chemistry, biochemistry, and biology courses. This study aimed to enhance students’ understanding of historically challenging organic chemistry concepts through instructional strategies informed by the three-dimensional learning (3DL) framework. Higher-order learning strategies (HOLS) were implemented to foster success in organic chemistry by integrating core disciplinary ideas, cross-cutting concepts, and scientific practices. In-class HOLS activities prompted students to recall foundational chemistry principles and apply scientific practices to connect with current course content. A mixed-methods research design was employed to evaluate the cognitive and affective impacts of HOLS interventions, using a modified crossover design to mitigate instructor influence. This approach alternated treatment and control conditions between two courses, enabling comparison of performance outcomes under traditional and HOLS-based instruction. Quantitative analysis, including statistical evaluation of 3DL assessment items, and qualitative thematic analysis of student interviews revealed significant improvements in performance and an increased recognition of the value of 3DL strategies. These findings contribute to ongoing efforts to integrate reform-oriented instruction into traditional undergraduate chemistry curricula.

Journal of Chemical EducationVol. 102(12)
University of California System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Innovative Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.