Is Jesus Physically Present in the Eucharist? Or How Not to Teach Berengarius

In Catholic Eucharistic theology, an influential metanarrative claims that the Catholic Church mitigated its condemnation of Berengarius of Tours, frequently claiming St. Thomas Aquinas and the Council of Trent as evidence for such a mitigation. The authors of this metanarrative claim that Catholic teaching prohibits the “crass realism” of Christ being “physically” present in the Eucharist. This paper first argues that the authors of the metanarrative have misinterpreted their historical evidence, particularly regarding the entailments of Christ’s substantial presence in these sources. It then argues, on the strength of the encyclical Mysterium Fidei, that the semantic range of “physically” can cover the same meaning as “corporeally,” allowing Catholic theologians to say that Christ is physically present in the Eucharist, subject to the appropriate qualifications of the Ro-man Catechism and Mysterium Fidei about the non-local presence of Christ.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16121497
Primary Topic
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Jesus Physically Present in the Eucharist? Or How Not to Teach Berengarius

Edmund Michael Lazzari
Religions
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
article

Is Jesus Physically Present in the Eucharist? Or How Not to Teach Berengarius

Edmund Michael Lazzari
article en

Abstract

In Catholic Eucharistic theology, an influential metanarrative claims that the Catholic Church mitigated its condemnation of Berengarius of Tours, frequently claiming St. Thomas Aquinas and the Council of Trent as evidence for such a mitigation. The authors of this metanarrative claim that Catholic teaching prohibits the “crass realism” of Christ being “physically” present in the Eucharist. This paper first argues that the authors of the metanarrative have misinterpreted their historical evidence, particularly regarding the entailments of Christ’s substantial presence in these sources. It then argues, on the strength of the encyclical Mysterium Fidei, that the semantic range of “physically” can cover the same meaning as “corporeally,” allowing Catholic theologians to say that Christ is physically present in the Eucharist, subject to the appropriate qualifications of the Ro-man Catechism and Mysterium Fidei about the non-local presence of Christ.

ReligionsVol. 16(12)
Duquesne University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Medieval Philosophy and Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.