Flourishing despite eating disorder risk: exploring undergraduate student academic, social and mental health outcomes via the dual continua model

Eating disorder (ED) risk is pervasive among undergraduate students, however, psychopathology and well-being can vary notably. Using National College Health Assessment (NCHA-III) (2023) data, 277 Atlantic Canadian undergraduate students (mean age 22.4 years) who screened positive for an ED based on the Sick Control One-stone Fat Food (SCOFF) scale were separated into flourishing (19.4%) and non-flourishing sub-samples using the Mental Health Continuum - Short Form (MHC-SF) scale. Chi square tests revealed that flourishing students were less likely to report problems with academics, faculty, and relationships, loneliness and isolation, and more likely to report stronger university belongingness. Flourishing students also indicated better self-assessed health, as well as, lower psychological distress, suicidality risk, psychological/mental health service utilization, and comorbid anxiety and depression. While SCOFF scores were significantly lower among flourishing students, body mass index (BMI) levels did not vary. Findings are considered via the dual continua model, with recommendations to enhance potential to flourish.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Health & Medicine
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2594167
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flourishing despite eating disorder risk: exploring undergraduate student academic, social and mental health outcomes via the dual continua model

Ken Fowler, Stacey Wareham‐Fowler, Corey L. M. Keyes
Psychology Health & Medicine
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Flourishing despite eating disorder risk: exploring undergraduate student academic, social and mental health outcomes via the dual continua model

Ken Fowler, Stacey Wareham‐Fowler, Corey L. M. Keyes
article en

Abstract

Eating disorder (ED) risk is pervasive among undergraduate students, however, psychopathology and well-being can vary notably. Using National College Health Assessment (NCHA-III) (2023) data, 277 Atlantic Canadian undergraduate students (mean age 22.4 years) who screened positive for an ED based on the Sick Control One-stone Fat Food (SCOFF) scale were separated into flourishing (19.4%) and non-flourishing sub-samples using the Mental Health Continuum - Short Form (MHC-SF) scale. Chi square tests revealed that flourishing students were less likely to report problems with academics, faculty, and relationships, loneliness and isolation, and more likely to report stronger university belongingness. Flourishing students also indicated better self-assessed health, as well as, lower psychological distress, suicidality risk, psychological/mental health service utilization, and comorbid anxiety and depression. While SCOFF scores were significantly lower among flourishing students, body mass index (BMI) levels did not vary. Findings are considered via the dual continua model, with recommendations to enhance potential to flourish.

Psychology Health & Medicine
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Emory University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.