Solo, Group, or Team Effort? Work Dynamics of Parliamentary Offices for Parliamentarians' Political Communications

Parliamentary assistants (PAs) to parliamentarians are recognised as a critical part of the parliamentary machinery. Despite their relevance in supporting parliamentarians’ work, the literature has shown little interest in them or their practices. Even less is known about the dynamics within parliamentary offices, or how PAs and their interactions shape parliamentarians’ political communication. The mediated character of parliamentarians’ public communication (e.g., on social media) is very often not even acknowledged. This article aims to address a research gap by exploring PAs’ work arrangements and interactions and how these shape parliamentarians’ political communication. The article utilises a comparative approach, focusing on Scotland-based Members of the House of Commons (MPs) and Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs). Fifty-three interviews with former and recent PAs and M(S)Ps were conducted and analysed to illuminate the “black box” of parliamentary offices’ inner workings. The article will address the following research questions: (a) How do parliamentarians organise communication-related tasks among their employed assistants? and (b) How is social media embedded in the political communication work processes of M(S)Ps’ staff members? This article identifies three approaches to creating political communication in these offices (solo, group, and team effort). The findings suggest that the implications of utilising these approaches are far-reaching, affecting individual learning and professionalisation processes, agency, workload, staff turnover, and even the office’s capacity to perform. The study also shows that M(S)Ps’ parliamentary offices are remarkably similar in terms of organisation, challenges, and overall setup.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics and Governance
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10696
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solo, Group, or Team Effort? Work Dynamics of Parliamentary Offices for Parliamentarians' Political Communications

Sebastian Ludwicki-Ziegler
1 citations
Politics and Governance
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
10.42
article

Solo, Group, or Team Effort? Work Dynamics of Parliamentary Offices for Parliamentarians' Political Communications

Sebastian Ludwicki-Ziegler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Parliamentary assistants (PAs) to parliamentarians are recognised as a critical part of the parliamentary machinery. Despite their relevance in supporting parliamentarians’ work, the literature has shown little interest in them or their practices. Even less is known about the dynamics within parliamentary offices, or how PAs and their interactions shape parliamentarians’ political communication. The mediated character of parliamentarians’ public communication (e.g., on social media) is very often not even acknowledged. This article aims to address a research gap by exploring PAs’ work arrangements and interactions and how these shape parliamentarians’ political communication. The article utilises a comparative approach, focusing on Scotland-based Members of the House of Commons (MPs) and Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs). Fifty-three interviews with former and recent PAs and M(S)Ps were conducted and analysed to illuminate the “black box” of parliamentary offices’ inner workings. The article will address the following research questions: (a) How do parliamentarians organise communication-related tasks among their employed assistants? and (b) How is social media embedded in the political communication work processes of M(S)Ps’ staff members? This article identifies three approaches to creating political communication in these offices (solo, group, and team effort). The findings suggest that the implications of utilising these approaches are far-reaching, affecting individual learning and professionalisation processes, agency, workload, staff turnover, and even the office’s capacity to perform. The study also shows that M(S)Ps’ parliamentary offices are remarkably similar in terms of organisation, challenges, and overall setup.

Politics and GovernanceVol. 14
University of Stirling (GB)
University of Stirling
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
10.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.