When Product Markets Become Collective Traps: The Case of Social Media

Individuals might experience negative utility from not consuming a popular product. With such externalities to nonusers, standard consumer surplus measures, which take aggregate consumption as given, fail to appropriately capture consumer welfare. We propose an approach to account for these externalities and apply it to estimate consumer welfare from two social media platforms: TikTok and Instagram. Incentivized experiments with college students indicate positive welfare based on the standard measure but negative welfare when accounting for these nonuser externalities. Our findings high-light the existence of product market traps, where active users of a platform prefer it not to exist. (JEL D62, D83, D91, L82, Z13)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20231468
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Product Markets Become Collective Traps: The Case of Social Media

Christopher G. Roth, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Leonardo Bursztyn, Benjamin Handel
2 citations
American Economic Review
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
4.15
article

When Product Markets Become Collective Traps: The Case of Social Media

Christopher G. Roth, Rafael Jiménez-Durán, Leonardo Bursztyn, Benjamin Handel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Individuals might experience negative utility from not consuming a popular product. With such externalities to nonusers, standard consumer surplus measures, which take aggregate consumption as given, fail to appropriately capture consumer welfare. We propose an approach to account for these externalities and apply it to estimate consumer welfare from two social media platforms: TikTok and Instagram. Incentivized experiments with college students indicate positive welfare based on the standard measure but negative welfare when accounting for these nonuser externalities. Our findings high-light the existence of product market traps, where active users of a platform prefer it not to exist. (JEL D62, D83, D91, L82, Z13)

American Economic ReviewVol. 115(12)
University of Chicago (US), Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics (DE), Bocconi University (IT), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
4.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.