Incentive Complexity, Bounded Rationality, and Effort Provision

Using field and laboratory experiments, we demonstrate that the complexity of incentive schemes and worker bounded rationality can affect effort provision. This is because some attributes of the incentives become opaque; that is, workers do not take them into account. In our setting, workers overprovide effort relative to a fully rational benchmark, improving efficiency. We identify contract features, and facets of worker cognitive ability, that matter for opacity. We find that even relatively small degrees of opacity can cause large shifts in behavior. Our results illustrate important implications of complexity and bounded rationality for designing and regulating workplace incentive contracts. (JEL C90, D21, D91, J22, J31, J41)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20230751
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incentive Complexity, Bounded Rationality, and Effort Provision

Collin Raymond, David Huffman, Johannes Abeler
2 citations
American Economic Review
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
4.73
article

Incentive Complexity, Bounded Rationality, and Effort Provision

Collin Raymond, David Huffman, Johannes Abeler
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Using field and laboratory experiments, we demonstrate that the complexity of incentive schemes and worker bounded rationality can affect effort provision. This is because some attributes of the incentives become opaque; that is, workers do not take them into account. In our setting, workers overprovide effort relative to a fully rational benchmark, improving efficiency. We identify contract features, and facets of worker cognitive ability, that matter for opacity. We find that even relatively small degrees of opacity can cause large shifts in behavior. Our results illustrate important implications of complexity and bounded rationality for designing and regulating workplace incentive contracts. (JEL C90, D21, D91, J22, J31, J41)

American Economic ReviewVol. 115(12)
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incentive Complexity, Bounded Rationality, and Effort Provision — Collin Raymond, David Huffman, et al. · American Economic Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS