Allocation Mechanisms with Mixture-Averse Preferences

Consider an economy with equal amounts of N types of goods, to be allocated to agents with strict quasi-convex preferences over lotteries. We show that ex ante, all Pareto-efficient allocations give almost all agents lotteries over at most two outcomes. Our results provide a simple criterion showing that many popular allocation mechanisms are ex ante inefficient. For the case of identical preferences, we establish existence of an efficient solution where all lotteries used are equally attractive. Assuming the reduction axiom, social welfare deteriorates by first randomizing over these binary lotteries. Efficient ex ante equality is achieved if agents satisfy the compound-independence axiom. (JEL D44, D61, D82)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20240339
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allocation Mechanisms with Mixture-Averse Preferences

Uzi Segal, David Dillenberger
American Economic Review
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Allocation Mechanisms with Mixture-Averse Preferences

Uzi Segal, David Dillenberger
article en

Abstract

Consider an economy with equal amounts of N types of goods, to be allocated to agents with strict quasi-convex preferences over lotteries. We show that ex ante, all Pareto-efficient allocations give almost all agents lotteries over at most two outcomes. Our results provide a simple criterion showing that many popular allocation mechanisms are ex ante inefficient. For the case of identical preferences, we establish existence of an efficient solution where all lotteries used are equally attractive. Assuming the reduction axiom, social welfare deteriorates by first randomizing over these binary lotteries. Efficient ex ante equality is achieved if agents satisfy the compound-independence axiom. (JEL D44, D61, D82)

American Economic ReviewVol. 115(12)
Boston College (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Allocation Mechanisms with Mixture-Averse Preferences — Uzi Segal, David Dillenberger · American Economic Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS