A Goldilocks Theory of Fiscal Deficits

We develop a tractable framework for deficit and debt dynamics. A “free lunch” fiscal deficit—one that raises spending without higher future taxes—is sustainable without zero lower bound (ZLB) only when R < G − φ, where φ is the sensitivity of the interest rate to the debt level. With the ZLB, both high and low deficits can increase debt, as the latter weaken demand and reduce nominal growth at the ZLB. A rise in income inequality expands fiscal space outside the ZLB, but contracts it at the ZLB. Calibrating the model, we find little space for “free lunch” policies for the United States in 2019, but significant space for Japan. (JEL D31, E23, E43, E62, H62, H63)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20220308
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Goldilocks Theory of Fiscal Deficits

Atif Mian, Amir Sufi, Ludwig Straub
1 citations
American Economic Review
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
3.13
article

A Goldilocks Theory of Fiscal Deficits

Atif Mian, Amir Sufi, Ludwig Straub
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We develop a tractable framework for deficit and debt dynamics. A “free lunch” fiscal deficit—one that raises spending without higher future taxes—is sustainable without zero lower bound (ZLB) only when R < G − φ, where φ is the sensitivity of the interest rate to the debt level. With the ZLB, both high and low deficits can increase debt, as the latter weaken demand and reduce nominal growth at the ZLB. A rise in income inequality expands fiscal space outside the ZLB, but contracts it at the ZLB. Calibrating the model, we find little space for “free lunch” policies for the United States in 2019, but significant space for Japan. (JEL D31, E23, E43, E62, H62, H63)

American Economic ReviewVol. 115(12)
Princeton University (US), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.