Effects of Pressure-Threshold Versus Dynamic Flow-Resistive Inspiratory Training on Respiratory Strength in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) strengthens the muscles of inspiration, improves maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and can be performed using pressure-threshold or dynamic flow-resistive devices. Varying costs and complexity between devices may limit accessibility for use. Although both devices have been used in IMT research, it is unclear if 1 device provides superior results. This study compared the effectiveness of matched-volume IMT delivered by pressure-threshold and dynamic flow-resistive loading on inspiratory strength in healthy adults. Methods: Twenty healthy adults were enrolled in this single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Baseline inspiratory strength by S-index was assessed before randomization into a pressure-threshold or dynamic flow-resistive IMT group. Participants in both groups performed IMT 5 days per week for 5 weeks, 30 maximal inhalations per session with resistance of 50% baseline S-index. Inspiratory strength testing was repeated at the end of the trial. Repeated-measures ANOVA assessed differences of pre-training and post-training S-index values between groups. Results: Both pressure-threshold and dynamic flow-resistive IMT produced significant improvement in S-index ( P < .01) by mean (SD) 15.5% (7.9) and 18.9% (15.5), respectively. No group by time interaction existed ( P = .41). Conclusions: Both pressure-threshold and dynamic flow-resistive IMT are effective at improving inspiratory strength in healthy populations. Comparable gains across modalities suggest that the magnitude of imposed resistive load, rather than specific valve or aperture mechanics, is the primary driver of diaphragmatic and accessory muscle adaptation. As both devices are equally effective, device selection for patients can be guided by cost, portability, and patient preference without compromising efficacy. Five weeks of IMT significantly improved inspiratory strength in healthy adults, independent of device type.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cpt.0000000000000312
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Pressure-Threshold Versus Dynamic Flow-Resistive Inspiratory Training on Respiratory Strength in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

N. Richter, Amy Toonstra, Andrew Jacobs, Nicole Sperling et al.
Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Effects of Pressure-Threshold Versus Dynamic Flow-Resistive Inspiratory Training on Respiratory Strength in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

N. Richter, Amy Toonstra, Andrew Jacobs, Nicole Sperling, Olive Westberg
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) strengthens the muscles of inspiration, improves maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and can be performed using pressure-threshold or dynamic flow-resistive devices. Varying costs and complexity between devices may limit accessibility for use. Although both devices have been used in IMT research, it is unclear if 1 device provides superior results. This study compared the effectiveness of matched-volume IMT delivered by pressure-threshold and dynamic flow-resistive loading on inspiratory strength in healthy adults. Methods: Twenty healthy adults were enrolled in this single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Baseline inspiratory strength by S-index was assessed before randomization into a pressure-threshold or dynamic flow-resistive IMT group. Participants in both groups performed IMT 5 days per week for 5 weeks, 30 maximal inhalations per session with resistance of 50% baseline S-index. Inspiratory strength testing was repeated at the end of the trial. Repeated-measures ANOVA assessed differences of pre-training and post-training S-index values between groups. Results: Both pressure-threshold and dynamic flow-resistive IMT produced significant improvement in S-index ( P < .01) by mean (SD) 15.5% (7.9) and 18.9% (15.5), respectively. No group by time interaction existed ( P = .41). Conclusions: Both pressure-threshold and dynamic flow-resistive IMT are effective at improving inspiratory strength in healthy populations. Comparable gains across modalities suggest that the magnitude of imposed resistive load, rather than specific valve or aperture mechanics, is the primary driver of diaphragmatic and accessory muscle adaptation. As both devices are equally effective, device selection for patients can be guided by cost, portability, and patient preference without compromising efficacy. Five weeks of IMT significantly improved inspiratory strength in healthy adults, independent of device type.

Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal
Concordia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.