Using Group Concept Mapping to Define Priorities for Lymphedema Care and Research

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cancer-related lymphedema is a common, lifelong, and disabling condition resulting from oncologic treatments. Although multidisciplinary collaboration enhances patient outcomes, a framework for research and therapeutic priorities for prevention and treatment is lacking. This study utilizes group concept mapping (GCM), a participatory research methodology, to highlight clinical and scholarly priorities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Providers and researchers involved in lymphedema care at The Ohio State University, a Lymphatic Education & Research Network (LE&RN) Center of Excellence, participated in a GCM study between November 2024 and January 2025. The groupwisdom® web-platform was used to (1) generate ideas for clinical/academic priorities for multidisciplinary collaboration, (2) sort priorities into categories, and (3) rate priorities on (a) the basis of their contribution to value-based care and (b) likelihood to secure research funding. Hierarchical cluster analysis yielded two-dimensional representations of conceptual similarity between items. Ratings were synthesized into GoZone plots demonstrating priorities most likely to secure funding and contribute to high-value care. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-five participants identified 74 priority areas. Cluster domains included: (1) identification/validation of patient-reported outcome metrics, (2) optimizing prospective surveillance, (3) surgical prevention/management of lymphedema, (4) diagnosis of lymphedema and downstream sequelae, (5) identifying risk factors/prediction tools, (6) basic/translational research, and (7) access to care/resource utilization. Improving access to care and mitigating resource barriers were deemed most impactful for delivering high-value care and ability to secure research funding. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Priorities identified at our LE&RN Lymphedema Center of Excellence provide a framework for multidisciplinary collaboration to improve care delivery and patient outcomes for those with and at-risk for cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lymphatic Research and Biology
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15578585251398872
Primary Topic
Lymphatic System and Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Group Concept Mapping to Define Priorities for Lymphedema Care and Research

Karen Hock, Sara P. Myers, Lynne Brophy, Electra D. Paskett et al.
Lymphatic Research and Biology
Lymphatic System and Diseases
article

Using Group Concept Mapping to Define Priorities for Lymphedema Care and Research

Karen Hock, Sara P. Myers, Lynne Brophy, Electra D. Paskett, Brittany Knauss, Daniel G. Stover, Carlo M. Contreras, Erin E. Burke, Scott R. Rosas, Dionisia Quiroga, William Edgar Carson, Magdalena Blaszkiewicz, Roman J. Skoracki, Min‐Jeong Cho, Ann McAlearney, Caitlin Kotian, Katherine Ashworth
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Cancer-related lymphedema is a common, lifelong, and disabling condition resulting from oncologic treatments. Although multidisciplinary collaboration enhances patient outcomes, a framework for research and therapeutic priorities for prevention and treatment is lacking. This study utilizes group concept mapping (GCM), a participatory research methodology, to highlight clinical and scholarly priorities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Providers and researchers involved in lymphedema care at The Ohio State University, a Lymphatic Education & Research Network (LE&RN) Center of Excellence, participated in a GCM study between November 2024 and January 2025. The groupwisdom® web-platform was used to (1) generate ideas for clinical/academic priorities for multidisciplinary collaboration, (2) sort priorities into categories, and (3) rate priorities on (a) the basis of their contribution to value-based care and (b) likelihood to secure research funding. Hierarchical cluster analysis yielded two-dimensional representations of conceptual similarity between items. Ratings were synthesized into GoZone plots demonstrating priorities most likely to secure funding and contribute to high-value care. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-five participants identified 74 priority areas. Cluster domains included: (1) identification/validation of patient-reported outcome metrics, (2) optimizing prospective surveillance, (3) surgical prevention/management of lymphedema, (4) diagnosis of lymphedema and downstream sequelae, (5) identifying risk factors/prediction tools, (6) basic/translational research, and (7) access to care/resource utilization. Improving access to care and mitigating resource barriers were deemed most impactful for delivering high-value care and ability to secure research funding. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Priorities identified at our LE&RN Lymphedema Center of Excellence provide a framework for multidisciplinary collaboration to improve care delivery and patient outcomes for those with and at-risk for cancer-related lymphedema.

Lymphatic Research and Biology
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Neurological Surgery (US), The Ohio State University (US), Ithaca College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lymphatic System and Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.