Artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of handheld single-lead electrocardiograms to predict incident atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the VITAL-AF randomized trial

Whether artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of single-lead ECG (1 L ECG) can predict incident AF is unknown. In the VITAL-AF trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03515057, registered 2/24/2021) of primary care patients aged ≥65 years undergoing handheld 1 L ECG screening, we tested three AI approaches to incident AF prediction, and compared the best model to the CHARGE-AF risk score. In a test set of 4,221 individuals, a published AI model trained using single standard ECG leads ("1 L ECG-AI") provided similar 2-year AF discrimination to models trained with VITAL-AF data. In the full VITAL-AF sample of 15,694 individuals without prevalent AF (2-year incident AF 3.1%), 1 L ECG-AI with age/sex (1 L ECG-AI AS) had comparable discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.695[0.637-0.742]; average precision [AP] 0.060[0.050-0.078]) to CHARGE-AF (AUROC 0.679[0.623-0.730]; AP 0.062[0.052-0.080], AUROC p = 0.46, AP p = 0.92). Net reclassification improvement was favorable versus age ≥65 years (0.27[0.22-0.32]). 1 L ECG-AI may increase efficiency and reach of AF screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02164-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of handheld single-lead electrocardiograms to predict incident atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the VITAL-AF randomized trial

Jennifer E. Ho, Christopher D. Anderson, Daniel E. Singer, Shinwan Kany et al.
2 citations
npj Digital Medicine
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
2.78
article

Artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of handheld single-lead electrocardiograms to predict incident atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the VITAL-AF randomized trial

Jennifer E. Ho, Christopher D. Anderson, Daniel E. Singer, Shinwan Kany, Leila H. Borowsky, Shaan Khurshid, Jeffrey M. Ashburner, Mostafa A. Al‐Alusi, Thomas Sommers, Sam Friedman, Steven J. Atlas, Mahnaz Maddah, David D. McManus, Steven A. Lubitz, Patrick T. Ellinor
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Whether artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of single-lead ECG (1 L ECG) can predict incident AF is unknown. In the VITAL-AF trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03515057, registered 2/24/2021) of primary care patients aged ≥65 years undergoing handheld 1 L ECG screening, we tested three AI approaches to incident AF prediction, and compared the best model to the CHARGE-AF risk score. In a test set of 4,221 individuals, a published AI model trained using single standard ECG leads ("1 L ECG-AI") provided similar 2-year AF discrimination to models trained with VITAL-AF data. In the full VITAL-AF sample of 15,694 individuals without prevalent AF (2-year incident AF 3.1%), 1 L ECG-AI with age/sex (1 L ECG-AI AS) had comparable discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.695[0.637-0.742]; average precision [AP] 0.060[0.050-0.078]) to CHARGE-AF (AUROC 0.679[0.623-0.730]; AP 0.062[0.052-0.080], AUROC p = 0.46, AP p = 0.92). Net reclassification improvement was favorable versus age ≥65 years (0.27[0.22-0.32]). 1 L ECG-AI may increase efficiency and reach of AF screening.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Broad Institute (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Heart Rhythm Society (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Mass General Brigham (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
American Heart Association, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.