An integrated gray relational analysis – FMEA approach for risk assessment of petrochemical projects during the design stage

Purpose This paper aims to enhance risk assessment during the design phase of petrochemical projects, where ineffective analysis often leads to cost overruns, delays and project failure. It proposes a hybrid gray-FMEA (failure mode and effects analysis) approach to manage uncertainty in expert evaluations and thus improve risk prioritization. Design/methodology/approach A hybrid approach combining gray theory with the traditional FMEA is proposed to improve the reliability of risk evaluation. The combination addresses uncertainties associated with expert judgments and prioritizes critical failure modes. An intensive literature review and expert input were used to identify key design-stage risks, which were then ranked using the proposed gray-FMEA approach and validated through real-world case studies. Findings The most identified critical failures include overlooking time and cost constraints, lack of thorough design reviews and inaccurate or missing information. These issues significantly impact project performance and highlight the need for early and structured intervention. The analysis emphasizes the need for a proactive and systematic approach for risk management during the early stages of project development. Practical implications The study offers a practical insight for project managers, design engineers and decision-makers in the petrochemical sector. It highlights the importance of conducting structured feasibility analyses, implementing rigorous and regular design reviews and establishing centralized systems for documentation and communication to reduce ambiguity and miscommunication. By adopting the proposed gray-FMEA approach, organizations can strengthen early risk detection, clarify design documentation and implement timely corrective measures before failures escalate, ultimately leading to more successful project outcomes. Originality/value This research introduces a novel structured risk assessment framework designed for petrochemical projects. The gray-FMEA approach serves as a practical tool for assisting project managers to proactively identify risks and implement timely corrective actions, thereby enhancing design reliability and overall project performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modelling in Management
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-04-2025-0167
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An integrated gray relational analysis – FMEA approach for risk assessment of petrochemical projects during the design stage

Awsan Mohammed, Laith A. Hadidi, Ahmed M. Ghaithan, Abbas Alabbas et al.
Journal of Modelling in Management
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

An integrated gray relational analysis – FMEA approach for risk assessment of petrochemical projects during the design stage

Awsan Mohammed, Laith A. Hadidi, Ahmed M. Ghaithan, Abbas Alabbas, Adel Alshibani, Ahmed Al-Baqami
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to enhance risk assessment during the design phase of petrochemical projects, where ineffective analysis often leads to cost overruns, delays and project failure. It proposes a hybrid gray-FMEA (failure mode and effects analysis) approach to manage uncertainty in expert evaluations and thus improve risk prioritization. Design/methodology/approach A hybrid approach combining gray theory with the traditional FMEA is proposed to improve the reliability of risk evaluation. The combination addresses uncertainties associated with expert judgments and prioritizes critical failure modes. An intensive literature review and expert input were used to identify key design-stage risks, which were then ranked using the proposed gray-FMEA approach and validated through real-world case studies. Findings The most identified critical failures include overlooking time and cost constraints, lack of thorough design reviews and inaccurate or missing information. These issues significantly impact project performance and highlight the need for early and structured intervention. The analysis emphasizes the need for a proactive and systematic approach for risk management during the early stages of project development. Practical implications The study offers a practical insight for project managers, design engineers and decision-makers in the petrochemical sector. It highlights the importance of conducting structured feasibility analyses, implementing rigorous and regular design reviews and establishing centralized systems for documentation and communication to reduce ambiguity and miscommunication. By adopting the proposed gray-FMEA approach, organizations can strengthen early risk detection, clarify design documentation and implement timely corrective measures before failures escalate, ultimately leading to more successful project outcomes. Originality/value This research introduces a novel structured risk assessment framework designed for petrochemical projects. The gray-FMEA approach serves as a practical tool for assisting project managers to proactively identify risks and implement timely corrective actions, thereby enhancing design reliability and overall project performance.

Journal of Modelling in Management
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization (SA), Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.