Teaching Tomorrow’s Pharmacists in an AI World: Risk, Responsibility, and Reflection

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) into higher education has created both opportunities and tensions, particularly within pharmacy education, where precision, ethical reasoning, and professional judgment are paramount. This commentary explores the complex role of genAI in pharmacy education through a process-versus-product framework, highlighting risks of overreliance by students and underscoring the responsibility of faculty to model ethical, reflective use. We advocate for structured genAI literacy initiatives, thoughtful policy development, and assessment redesigns that reinforce critical thinking over rote correctness. Responsible genAI use should be embedded as a core professional competency, akin to the use of clinical decision-support tools. Importantly, pharmacy educators must reclaim and enhance the efficiencies gained through genAI to deepen mentorship and foster student growth, not to increase productivity demands. The commentary concludes with a call for pharmacy education to remain human-centered, ensuring that genAI serves as a tool to elevate, rather than replace, the human in education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101905
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Tomorrow’s Pharmacists in an AI World: Risk, Responsibility, and Reflection

Michael J. Gonyeau, Jeff Cain, Vivek Dave, Keegan Sawyer
1 citations
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Teaching Tomorrow’s Pharmacists in an AI World: Risk, Responsibility, and Reflection

Michael J. Gonyeau, Jeff Cain, Vivek Dave, Keegan Sawyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) into higher education has created both opportunities and tensions, particularly within pharmacy education, where precision, ethical reasoning, and professional judgment are paramount. This commentary explores the complex role of genAI in pharmacy education through a process-versus-product framework, highlighting risks of overreliance by students and underscoring the responsibility of faculty to model ethical, reflective use. We advocate for structured genAI literacy initiatives, thoughtful policy development, and assessment redesigns that reinforce critical thinking over rote correctness. Responsible genAI use should be embedded as a core professional competency, akin to the use of clinical decision-support tools. Importantly, pharmacy educators must reclaim and enhance the efficiencies gained through genAI to deepen mentorship and foster student growth, not to increase productivity demands. The commentary concludes with a call for pharmacy education to remain human-centered, ensuring that genAI serves as a tool to elevate, rather than replace, the human in education.

American Journal of Pharmaceutical EducationVol. 89(12)
Northeastern University (US), University of Kentucky (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Wellcome Centre for Anti-Infectives Research (GB), St. John Fisher University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.