Accuracy of Large Language Model Responses Versus Internet Searches for Common Questions About Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy: Exploratory Simulation Study

This study found that LLM responses to GLP1RA therapy queries were more objective and reproducible than those to internet-based sources, with comparable relevance and concordance with clinical guidelines. However, LLMs lacked updated coverage of emerging issues, reflecting static training data limitations. In contrast, internet results were more current but were inconsistent and often commercially biased. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to provide reliable and comprehensible health information, particularly for individuals hesitant to seek professional advice, while emphasizing the need for human oversight, dynamic data integration, and evaluation of readability to ensure safe and equitable use in obesity care. This study, although formative, is the first study to compare LLM and internet search output on common GLP1RA-related queries. It paves the way for future studies to explore how LLMs can integrate real-time data retrieval and evaluate their readability for lay audiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/78289
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Large Language Model Responses Versus Internet Searches for Common Questions About Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy: Exploratory Simulation Study

Phong Ching Lee, Gerald Gui Ren Sng, Sarah Ying Tse Tan
1 citations
JMIR Formative Research
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.82
article

Accuracy of Large Language Model Responses Versus Internet Searches for Common Questions About Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy: Exploratory Simulation Study

Phong Ching Lee, Gerald Gui Ren Sng, Sarah Ying Tse Tan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study found that LLM responses to GLP1RA therapy queries were more objective and reproducible than those to internet-based sources, with comparable relevance and concordance with clinical guidelines. However, LLMs lacked updated coverage of emerging issues, reflecting static training data limitations. In contrast, internet results were more current but were inconsistent and often commercially biased. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs to provide reliable and comprehensible health information, particularly for individuals hesitant to seek professional advice, while emphasizing the need for human oversight, dynamic data integration, and evaluation of readability to ensure safe and equitable use in obesity care. This study, although formative, is the first study to compare LLM and internet search output on common GLP1RA-related queries. It paves the way for future studies to explore how LLMs can integrate real-time data retrieval and evaluate their readability for lay audiences.

JMIR Formative ResearchVol. 9
Singapore General Hospital (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy of Large Language Model Responses Versus Internet Searches for Common Questions About Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy: Exploratory Simulation Study — Phong Ching Lee, Gerald Gui Ren Sng, et al. · JMIR Formative Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS