University Students’ Responses to Fake News on Social Media

This study examines how university students receive and respond to unverified information on social media, focusing on behaviors such as acceptance, verification, sharing, and passive reception. Applying the Dual-Process Theory, the findings suggest that students often rely on heuristic processing, meaning they tend to believe or ignore information based on its familiarity, popularity, or emotional appeal. The results also indicate that while many students believe they can detect fake news, their actual fact-checking behaviors are inconsistent. A significant portion of respondents admitted to having shared unverified information, while others simply received it passively without any response. This reveals a notable gap between skepticism and active verification. Therefore, there is a need for media literacy education programs and accuracy-focused interventions to encourage systematic information processing and reduce the risk of fake news dissemination among students.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
VNU Journal of Science Education Research
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.5393
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University Students’ Responses to Fake News on Social Media

Lu Thi Mai Oanh, Ha Anh Binh, Nguyen Quy Thanh
VNU Journal of Science Education Research
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

University Students’ Responses to Fake News on Social Media

Lu Thi Mai Oanh, Ha Anh Binh, Nguyen Quy Thanh
article en

Abstract

This study examines how university students receive and respond to unverified information on social media, focusing on behaviors such as acceptance, verification, sharing, and passive reception. Applying the Dual-Process Theory, the findings suggest that students often rely on heuristic processing, meaning they tend to believe or ignore information based on its familiarity, popularity, or emotional appeal. The results also indicate that while many students believe they can detect fake news, their actual fact-checking behaviors are inconsistent. A significant portion of respondents admitted to having shared unverified information, while others simply received it passively without any response. This reveals a notable gap between skepticism and active verification. Therefore, there is a need for media literacy education programs and accuracy-focused interventions to encourage systematic information processing and reduce the risk of fake news dissemination among students.

VNU Journal of Science Education Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

University Students’ Responses to Fake News on Social Media — Lu Thi Mai Oanh, Ha Anh Binh, et al. · VNU Journal of Science Education Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS