The effect of underdog expectations on employee expediency: an emotion appraisal mechanism

Purpose Existing research has illustrated that underdog expectations – individuals’ perceptions that others view them as unlikely to succeed – can lead to unethical behaviors. Yet, the field is limited in understanding the affective mechanisms that link underdog expectations to unethical behaviors and the specific types of unethical behaviors that are triggered by underdog expectations. Drawing upon the appraisal theory of emotion, this study explores the “hot” emotional mechanism between underdog expectations and employee expediency. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from a two-wave time-lagged field study with a sample of 435 employees from eight companies. The hypotheses were supported through regression analysis and simple slope analysis. Findings Underdog expectations are positively related to workplace anxiety, which in turn leads to employee expediency. Additionally, the desire to gain face consciousness exerts a positive moderating effect on the positive correlation between underdog expectations and workplace anxiety, while the fear of losing face does not exhibit significant moderation. Practical implications This study provides theoretical enlightenment for organizational practitioners in managing underdog employees, recommending that enterprises treat underdog employees equitably and maintain positive expectations for them to prevent unethical behaviors that could harm organizational development. Originality/value This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how and when underdog expectations can influence employee expediency through an emotional appraisal mechanism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personnel Review
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-11-2024-1023
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of underdog expectations on employee expediency: an emotion appraisal mechanism

Qiaozhuan Liang, Yifan Li, Jie Li, Zhuojing Li
Personnel Review
Ethics in Business and Education
article

The effect of underdog expectations on employee expediency: an emotion appraisal mechanism

Qiaozhuan Liang, Yifan Li, Jie Li, Zhuojing Li
article en

Abstract

Purpose Existing research has illustrated that underdog expectations – individuals’ perceptions that others view them as unlikely to succeed – can lead to unethical behaviors. Yet, the field is limited in understanding the affective mechanisms that link underdog expectations to unethical behaviors and the specific types of unethical behaviors that are triggered by underdog expectations. Drawing upon the appraisal theory of emotion, this study explores the “hot” emotional mechanism between underdog expectations and employee expediency. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from a two-wave time-lagged field study with a sample of 435 employees from eight companies. The hypotheses were supported through regression analysis and simple slope analysis. Findings Underdog expectations are positively related to workplace anxiety, which in turn leads to employee expediency. Additionally, the desire to gain face consciousness exerts a positive moderating effect on the positive correlation between underdog expectations and workplace anxiety, while the fear of losing face does not exhibit significant moderation. Practical implications This study provides theoretical enlightenment for organizational practitioners in managing underdog employees, recommending that enterprises treat underdog employees equitably and maintain positive expectations for them to prevent unethical behaviors that could harm organizational development. Originality/value This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how and when underdog expectations can influence employee expediency through an emotional appraisal mechanism.

Personnel ReviewVol. 55(1)
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.