Plant-Based Milk Alternatives: Nutrition, Safety, and the Global Case for Fortification Policy

Abstract Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) such as soy, almond and oat are an increasingly popular alternative to cow’s milk across the world, due to more people following vegan diets, being more aware of allergies and a drive towards sustainability. However, policies guiding their fortification vary between territories. Cow’s milk provides crucial micronutrients such as calcium, vitamin B12 and iodine which may not be substituted by PBMAs. This case study explores the nutritional value and safety considerations of PBMAs, highlighting the SACN/COT 2025 review’s findings that identified nutritional gaps particularly in oat and almond milk. Safety concerns over contaminants and sugar content are discussed, and evidence of risk analysed. The study looks at other drivers towards food fortification as models for future practice. It concludes by highlighting the need for evidence-based, harmonised international standards to ensure PBMAs support healthy diets and meet consumer needs. Information © The Author 2025

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Science and Nutrition Cases
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1079/fsncases.2025.0024
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plant-Based Milk Alternatives: Nutrition, Safety, and the Global Case for Fortification Policy

Stephanie Cawthorne
Food Science and Nutrition Cases
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Plant-Based Milk Alternatives: Nutrition, Safety, and the Global Case for Fortification Policy

Stephanie Cawthorne
article en

Abstract

Abstract Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMAs) such as soy, almond and oat are an increasingly popular alternative to cow’s milk across the world, due to more people following vegan diets, being more aware of allergies and a drive towards sustainability. However, policies guiding their fortification vary between territories. Cow’s milk provides crucial micronutrients such as calcium, vitamin B12 and iodine which may not be substituted by PBMAs. This case study explores the nutritional value and safety considerations of PBMAs, highlighting the SACN/COT 2025 review’s findings that identified nutritional gaps particularly in oat and almond milk. Safety concerns over contaminants and sugar content are discussed, and evidence of risk analysed. The study looks at other drivers towards food fortification as models for future practice. It concludes by highlighting the need for evidence-based, harmonised international standards to ensure PBMAs support healthy diets and meet consumer needs. Information © The Author 2025

Food Science and Nutrition Cases
Nutrition 21 (United States) (US), University of Westminster (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.