Effects of dietary fat supplementation on enteric methane mitigation and farm profitability: A case study of an organic and a conventional dairy herd

• Enteric methane mitigation depended on the basal diet and supplemental fat level; • Methane intensity declined due to lower feed intake, higher fat intake, and more milk; • Gross margin declined in both herds, mainly due to increased feed cost; • Financial incentives are needed to encourage farmers to adopt fat supplementation. Dietary fat supplementation is widely recognized as a mitigation strategy for enteric methane (CH 4 ) emissions in dairy production, yet limited information exists on its impact at the herd level and its implications for farm profitability. Here, we used a herd simulation model to assess the impact of fat supplementation on herd-level CH 4 intensity (g CH 4 /kg ECM) and gross margin. The simulation was conducted in digital twins of two real dairy herds - one organic and one conventional. For each herd, we simulated four scenarios combining two levels of supplemental fatty acids (FA), namely 10 (FA10) and 15 (FA15) g/kg DM, with two application periods: the full lactation period and from week 5 of lactation. The results showed that supplemented FA reduced herd-level enteric CH 4 intensity by 3.8 to 7.2 %. This reduction was influenced by both the basal diet's FA content and the amount supplemented. The gross margin decreased across all scenarios in both herds, with a greater reduction observed in the conventional herd. Supplementing FA from week 5 of lactation had a minor effect on both herd CH 4 intensity and gross margin compared to full lactation application. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the change in ECM as a result of fat supplementation influenced both herd CH 4 intensity and gross margin, whereas the variation in milk price impacted gross margin, highlighting the need for cautious practice. Our findings emphasised the importance of analysing the cost-effectiveness of emission mitigation strategies to support informed farm decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Livestock Science
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2025.105856
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of dietary fat supplementation on enteric methane mitigation and farm profitability: A case study of an organic and a conventional dairy herd

Martin Riis Weisbjerg, N. H. Jørgensen, Vivi Mørkøre Thorup, L. Chen et al.
Livestock Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Effects of dietary fat supplementation on enteric methane mitigation and farm profitability: A case study of an organic and a conventional dairy herd

Martin Riis Weisbjerg, N. H. Jørgensen, Vivi Mørkøre Thorup, L. Chen, Søren Østergaard
article en

Abstract

• Enteric methane mitigation depended on the basal diet and supplemental fat level; • Methane intensity declined due to lower feed intake, higher fat intake, and more milk; • Gross margin declined in both herds, mainly due to increased feed cost; • Financial incentives are needed to encourage farmers to adopt fat supplementation. Dietary fat supplementation is widely recognized as a mitigation strategy for enteric methane (CH 4 ) emissions in dairy production, yet limited information exists on its impact at the herd level and its implications for farm profitability. Here, we used a herd simulation model to assess the impact of fat supplementation on herd-level CH 4 intensity (g CH 4 /kg ECM) and gross margin. The simulation was conducted in digital twins of two real dairy herds - one organic and one conventional. For each herd, we simulated four scenarios combining two levels of supplemental fatty acids (FA), namely 10 (FA10) and 15 (FA15) g/kg DM, with two application periods: the full lactation period and from week 5 of lactation. The results showed that supplemented FA reduced herd-level enteric CH 4 intensity by 3.8 to 7.2 %. This reduction was influenced by both the basal diet's FA content and the amount supplemented. The gross margin decreased across all scenarios in both herds, with a greater reduction observed in the conventional herd. Supplementing FA from week 5 of lactation had a minor effect on both herd CH 4 intensity and gross margin compared to full lactation application. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the change in ECM as a result of fat supplementation influenced both herd CH 4 intensity and gross margin, whereas the variation in milk price impacted gross margin, highlighting the need for cautious practice. Our findings emphasised the importance of analysing the cost-effectiveness of emission mitigation strategies to support informed farm decision-making.

Livestock ScienceVol. 303
Aarhus University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.