Who uses AI in research, and for what? Large-scale survey evidence from Germany

The integration of AI into scientific work holds significant potential to accelerate innovation. We surveyed researchers in two leading German research organizations to examine AI adoption, barriers, and perceived impact on research. Researchers are widely using AI tools – often for primary and creative tasks – and many expect the technology to be transformative for research. Effective use appears linked to both hands-on experience and engagement with learning resources. A persistent gender gap in AI use is closely associated with differences in familiarity, suggesting a potential focus for organizational efforts. Legal uncertainty and privacy concerns also emerge as major barriers, with researchers calling for clear, high-level regulatory guidance. Overall, our findings suggest directions where institutional actions might be explored to promote more equitable and effective AI adoption. • Over 6000 researchers were surveyed across two major German research organizations. • Researchers actively use AI, including for core and creative research tasks. • Gender gap in AI use largely reflects differences in familiarity, not attitudes. • Researchers cite legal uncertainty as a major barrier to AI adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Policy
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105381
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who uses AI in research, and for what? Large-scale survey evidence from Germany

Katharina Hölzle, Dietmar Harhoff, Marina Chugunova, Verena Lisa Kaschub et al.
5 citations
Research Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
article

Who uses AI in research, and for what? Large-scale survey evidence from Germany

Katharina Hölzle, Dietmar Harhoff, Marina Chugunova, Verena Lisa Kaschub, Robert F. Rose, Sonal Malagimani, Ulrike Morgalla
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The integration of AI into scientific work holds significant potential to accelerate innovation. We surveyed researchers in two leading German research organizations to examine AI adoption, barriers, and perceived impact on research. Researchers are widely using AI tools – often for primary and creative tasks – and many expect the technology to be transformative for research. Effective use appears linked to both hands-on experience and engagement with learning resources. A persistent gender gap in AI use is closely associated with differences in familiarity, suggesting a potential focus for organizational efforts. Legal uncertainty and privacy concerns also emerge as major barriers, with researchers calling for clear, high-level regulatory guidance. Overall, our findings suggest directions where institutional actions might be explored to promote more equitable and effective AI adoption. • Over 6000 researchers were surveyed across two major German research organizations. • Researchers actively use AI, including for core and creative research tasks. • Gender gap in AI use largely reflects differences in familiarity, not attitudes. • Researchers cite legal uncertainty as a major barrier to AI adoption.

Research PolicyVol. 55(2)
University of Stuttgart (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering (DE), Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (DE), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
11.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.