Assessment of Public Acceptance and Compliance with Traffic Congestion Pricing: A Case Study of Ranchi City, India

This work evaluates the necessity and efficacy of congestion pricing on the main road in Ranchi city, aiming to provide a detailed roadmap for its implementation and address potential challenges. Extensive data analysis reveals severe traffic congestion, particularly during peak hours, with Passenger Car Units (PCU) peaking at 2,747 and Peak Hour Factors (PHF) reaching 0.97. Economic assessments highlight significant losses resulting from prolonged travel times, increased fuel consumption, and elevated environmental costs associated with emissions. The findings indicate that time loss costs for commuters and businesses are substantial, with heavy motor vehicles incurring up to ₹2.53 per km in time costs and ₹12 per km in fuel costs. Environmental costs are also considerable due to increased CO2 emissions. The proposed congestion pricing strategy includes a charge of ₹50 for heavy vehicles, ₹30 for four-wheelers, ₹20 for three-wheelers, and ₹10 for two-wheelers during peak hours. This strategy aims to optimize traffic flow, reduce delays, and improve air quality. This study highlights the pressing need for effective traffic management solutions to improve urban mobility and economic efficiency in urban areas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Transport Engineering
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54105/ijte.b1913.05021125
Primary Topic
Transportation Planning and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Public Acceptance and Compliance with Traffic Congestion Pricing: A Case Study of Ranchi City, India

Rajeev Kumar, Ajai Singh
Indian Journal of Transport Engineering
Transportation Planning and Optimization
article

Assessment of Public Acceptance and Compliance with Traffic Congestion Pricing: A Case Study of Ranchi City, India

Rajeev Kumar, Ajai Singh
article en

Abstract

This work evaluates the necessity and efficacy of congestion pricing on the main road in Ranchi city, aiming to provide a detailed roadmap for its implementation and address potential challenges. Extensive data analysis reveals severe traffic congestion, particularly during peak hours, with Passenger Car Units (PCU) peaking at 2,747 and Peak Hour Factors (PHF) reaching 0.97. Economic assessments highlight significant losses resulting from prolonged travel times, increased fuel consumption, and elevated environmental costs associated with emissions. The findings indicate that time loss costs for commuters and businesses are substantial, with heavy motor vehicles incurring up to ₹2.53 per km in time costs and ₹12 per km in fuel costs. Environmental costs are also considerable due to increased CO2 emissions. The proposed congestion pricing strategy includes a charge of ₹50 for heavy vehicles, ₹30 for four-wheelers, ₹20 for three-wheelers, and ₹10 for two-wheelers during peak hours. This strategy aims to optimize traffic flow, reduce delays, and improve air quality. This study highlights the pressing need for effective traffic management solutions to improve urban mobility and economic efficiency in urban areas.

Indian Journal of Transport EngineeringVol. 5(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Transportation Planning and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of Public Acceptance and Compliance with Traffic Congestion Pricing: A Case Study of Ranchi City, India — Rajeev Kumar, Ajai Singh · Indian Journal of Transport Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS