A Test-Negative Design for Immune Correlates Approximates a Traditional Exposure-Proximal Design but Requires Far Fewer Blood Samples

Traditional vaccine clinical trials sample blood from all participants. In contrast, the test-negative immune correlates (TNIC) design only samples blood from participants who develop symptoms. We compared traditional to test-negative immune correlates methods in the mRNA-1273 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine efficacy clinical trial. Using a neutralizing antibody assay, hazard ratios were 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], .29-.73) and 0.55 (95% CI, .28-1.06) for traditional and test-negative methods, respectively. Analogous ratios for binding antibody assay were 0.69 (95% CI, .52-.94) and 0.78 (95% CI, .50-1.20). The results support use of the logistically simpler TNIC design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf572
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Test-Negative Design for Immune Correlates Approximates a Traditional Exposure-Proximal Design but Requires Far Fewer Blood Samples

Leah Andrews, Haiyu Zhou, Bob C. Lin, Avika Dixit et al.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

A Test-Negative Design for Immune Correlates Approximates a Traditional Exposure-Proximal Design but Requires Far Fewer Blood Samples

Leah Andrews, Haiyu Zhou, Bob C. Lin, Avika Dixit, Richard A. Koup, Hana M. El Sahly, Eric Chun‐Pu Chu, Jonathan Fintzi, Frances Priddy, Jon Toma, Holly Janes, Dean A. Follmann, Leonid Serebryannyy, L Weiping Deng, Peter B. Gilbert, Lindsey Robert Baden, Lauren Dang, Robin Carroll
article en

Abstract

Traditional vaccine clinical trials sample blood from all participants. In contrast, the test-negative immune correlates (TNIC) design only samples blood from participants who develop symptoms. We compared traditional to test-negative immune correlates methods in the mRNA-1273 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine efficacy clinical trial. Using a neutralizing antibody assay, hazard ratios were 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], .29-.73) and 0.55 (95% CI, .28-1.06) for traditional and test-negative methods, respectively. Analogous ratios for binding antibody assay were 0.69 (95% CI, .52-.94) and 0.78 (95% CI, .50-1.20). The results support use of the logistically simpler TNIC design.

The Journal of Infectious DiseasesVol. 233(3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Moderna Therapeutics (United States) (US), IGM Biosciences (United States) (US), Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.