PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

The treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(LA-NPC) is challenged by recurrence and metastasis(R/M), and even though concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CRT) is the standard regimen, new strategies are urgently needed to improve patient prognosis. In recent years, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, as an important representative of immunotherapy, have shown potential in several studies. However, systematic evidence on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in LA-NPC is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in LA-NPC treatment by systematic review and meta-analysis methods. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (as of March 2025) using subject terms combined with free words to include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for LA-NPC. The primary outcome metrics were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2 studies involving 575 participants were included. This meta-analysis showed that patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy combined with CRT had improved PFS (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18–0.89) and EFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38–0.92). For distant metastasis rate and locoregional recurrence rate, PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy combined with CRT was more effective, reaching (OR: 0.50,95% CI: 0.30–0.85 I²=0%, P = 0.8) and (OR: 0.43,95% CI: 0.22–0.81 I²=39%, P = 0.2), respectively, which were significantly lower than patients who received only CRT. However, there was no significant difference in OS (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.48–1.43,I²=0%, P = 0.34). Safety analysis showed that PD-1 inhibitor treatment was accompanied by a significantly increased risk of immune-related adverse events(IRAEs)(Peto OR: 11.14, 95% CI: 7.79–15.93 I²=93%, P < 0.0001) and incidence of > = grade 3 AEs (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.04–2.17 I²=0%, P = 0.7). The meta-analysis showed that PD-1 inhibitors combined with CRT in LA-NPC improved their disease control (in terms of PFS and EFS) and reduced disease recurrence and metastasis, but the effect on OS is unknown and increases the risk of IRAEs. The current evidence is based on limited study data, and its exact efficacy and safety need to be confirmed with more high-quality data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-15229-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Zhiyuan Shang, Jintian Gao, Jinpeng Wang, Xiaohan Liu et al.
1 citations
BMC Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
1.85
article

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Zhiyuan Shang, Jintian Gao, Jinpeng Wang, Xiaohan Liu, Nan Jiang, Dan Zhou, Yan Gui
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(LA-NPC) is challenged by recurrence and metastasis(R/M), and even though concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CRT) is the standard regimen, new strategies are urgently needed to improve patient prognosis. In recent years, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, as an important representative of immunotherapy, have shown potential in several studies. However, systematic evidence on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in LA-NPC is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in LA-NPC treatment by systematic review and meta-analysis methods. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (as of March 2025) using subject terms combined with free words to include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for LA-NPC. The primary outcome metrics were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2 studies involving 575 participants were included. This meta-analysis showed that patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy combined with CRT had improved PFS (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18–0.89) and EFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38–0.92). For distant metastasis rate and locoregional recurrence rate, PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy combined with CRT was more effective, reaching (OR: 0.50,95% CI: 0.30–0.85 I²=0%, P = 0.8) and (OR: 0.43,95% CI: 0.22–0.81 I²=39%, P = 0.2), respectively, which were significantly lower than patients who received only CRT. However, there was no significant difference in OS (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.48–1.43,I²=0%, P = 0.34). Safety analysis showed that PD-1 inhibitor treatment was accompanied by a significantly increased risk of immune-related adverse events(IRAEs)(Peto OR: 11.14, 95% CI: 7.79–15.93 I²=93%, P < 0.0001) and incidence of > = grade 3 AEs (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.04–2.17 I²=0%, P = 0.7). The meta-analysis showed that PD-1 inhibitors combined with CRT in LA-NPC improved their disease control (in terms of PFS and EFS) and reduced disease recurrence and metastasis, but the effect on OS is unknown and increases the risk of IRAEs. The current evidence is based on limited study data, and its exact efficacy and safety need to be confirmed with more high-quality data.

BMC CancerVol. 26(1)
Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CN), First Hospital of Lanzhou University (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
1.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.