A Preliminary Conceptual Framework of Clinical Documentation Burden: Exploratory Factor Analysis Investigating Usability, Effort, and Perceived Burden among Health Care Providers

For every 30 minutes a provider spends seeing a patient, they spend 36 minutes charting in the electronic health record (EHR). Clinical documentation burden in U.S. health care is driven by increasing administrative tasks associated with EHRs, regulatory demands, and workflow inefficiencies. This burden contributes to increased cognitive load, fragmented care, and staff burnout. No comprehensive conceptual framework guides researchers addressing these challenges.This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework clarifying the interplay between psychological factors, technology, and documentation attributes-usability, effort, and perceived burden-among health care providers.Data were collected from a cross-sectional survey using a convenience sample of hospital- and ambulatory-based physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, and physician assistants. A newly constructed questionnaire was used, incorporating elements from well-established instruments. Descriptive and exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify significant findings and develop the preliminary Clinical Documentation Burden Framework.The analysis revealed three main factors underpinning clinical documentation burden: Poor usability, perceived task value, and excessive mental exertion. These factors were significantly correlated with professional dissonance (PD) and burnout, underscoring the complex interplay between time requirements, design challenges, task engagement, and cognitive load. The resulting conceptual framework highlights the importance of aligning documentation tasks with provider values to mitigate burden.The study offers new insights into the complex phenomenon of documentation burden affecting health care providers by incorporating key psychological factors. This conceptual framework provides a preliminary foundation for understanding this multifaceted problem. Like prior burnout research, conceptual clarity is key to creating shared definitions and a dedicated measurement instrument to support effective interventions. Given that the sample was predominantly advanced practice providers with underpowered subgroup comparisons, the framework should be interpreted as preliminary. This new appreciation of the dimensionality of documentation burden expands the potential levers available to alleviate operational strain and reduce PD and burnout.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2751-1896
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Preliminary Conceptual Framework of Clinical Documentation Burden: Exploratory Factor Analysis Investigating Usability, Effort, and Perceived Burden among Health Care Providers

Abby Swanson Kazley, Jennifer Ferrand, Rhiannon Doherty, Eva L. Karp
Applied Clinical Informatics
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

A Preliminary Conceptual Framework of Clinical Documentation Burden: Exploratory Factor Analysis Investigating Usability, Effort, and Perceived Burden among Health Care Providers

Abby Swanson Kazley, Jennifer Ferrand, Rhiannon Doherty, Eva L. Karp
article en

Abstract

For every 30 minutes a provider spends seeing a patient, they spend 36 minutes charting in the electronic health record (EHR). Clinical documentation burden in U.S. health care is driven by increasing administrative tasks associated with EHRs, regulatory demands, and workflow inefficiencies. This burden contributes to increased cognitive load, fragmented care, and staff burnout. No comprehensive conceptual framework guides researchers addressing these challenges.This study aimed to develop a conceptual framework clarifying the interplay between psychological factors, technology, and documentation attributes-usability, effort, and perceived burden-among health care providers.Data were collected from a cross-sectional survey using a convenience sample of hospital- and ambulatory-based physicians, advanced practice registered nurses, and physician assistants. A newly constructed questionnaire was used, incorporating elements from well-established instruments. Descriptive and exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify significant findings and develop the preliminary Clinical Documentation Burden Framework.The analysis revealed three main factors underpinning clinical documentation burden: Poor usability, perceived task value, and excessive mental exertion. These factors were significantly correlated with professional dissonance (PD) and burnout, underscoring the complex interplay between time requirements, design challenges, task engagement, and cognitive load. The resulting conceptual framework highlights the importance of aligning documentation tasks with provider values to mitigate burden.The study offers new insights into the complex phenomenon of documentation burden affecting health care providers by incorporating key psychological factors. This conceptual framework provides a preliminary foundation for understanding this multifaceted problem. Like prior burnout research, conceptual clarity is key to creating shared definitions and a dedicated measurement instrument to support effective interventions. Given that the sample was predominantly advanced practice providers with underpowered subgroup comparisons, the framework should be interpreted as preliminary. This new appreciation of the dimensionality of documentation burden expands the potential levers available to alleviate operational strain and reduce PD and burnout.

Applied Clinical InformaticsVol. 16(05)
Hartford Hospital (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.