Preparing for Tomorrow's Teamwork: Insights From eSports on How Human Expertise Shapes Training Needs for AI‐Integrated Work

ABSTRACT As organizations increasingly adopt human‐AI teams (HATs), understanding how to enhance team performance is paramount. A crucially underexplored area for supporting HATs is training, particularly helping human teammates to work with these inorganic counterparts. Indeed, research on training for HATs is limited, often relying on human team training frameworks, failing to consider the humans' expertise‐based training needs and how this may affect collaboration with AI. To bridge this gap, we interviewed competitive eSports athletes ( N = 22), a group experienced in training with AI, to discuss the gaps in current human–AI training and their desires for future training that better supports humans in AI‐integrated work. Using the quantitative ethnography (QE) tool, epistemic network analysis (ENA), we examine these training needs and how they vary based on the participants' task expertise. Our findings indicate that current training methods focus on using AI for taskwork training, with significant expertise differences identified due to diverging perceptions on this taskwork focus as well as tensions related to balancing adaptability with predictability and clashing attitudes toward training with AI. Future training must evolve to deepen understanding and trust between humans and AI, focusing on socio‐emotional bonds and role awareness to offer greater benefits for teaming. We conclude with three actionable recommendations for organizational research on training for HATs to expand these findings to broader contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70036
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing for Tomorrow's Teamwork: Insights From eSports on How Human Expertise Shapes Training Needs for AI‐Integrated Work

Nathan J. McNeese, Christopher Flathmann, Tom O’Neill, Caitlin Lancaster et al.
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Preparing for Tomorrow's Teamwork: Insights From eSports on How Human Expertise Shapes Training Needs for AI‐Integrated Work

Nathan J. McNeese, Christopher Flathmann, Tom O’Neill, Caitlin Lancaster, Jennifer L. Hsu, Eduardo Salas
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As organizations increasingly adopt human‐AI teams (HATs), understanding how to enhance team performance is paramount. A crucially underexplored area for supporting HATs is training, particularly helping human teammates to work with these inorganic counterparts. Indeed, research on training for HATs is limited, often relying on human team training frameworks, failing to consider the humans' expertise‐based training needs and how this may affect collaboration with AI. To bridge this gap, we interviewed competitive eSports athletes ( N = 22), a group experienced in training with AI, to discuss the gaps in current human–AI training and their desires for future training that better supports humans in AI‐integrated work. Using the quantitative ethnography (QE) tool, epistemic network analysis (ENA), we examine these training needs and how they vary based on the participants' task expertise. Our findings indicate that current training methods focus on using AI for taskwork training, with significant expertise differences identified due to diverging perceptions on this taskwork focus as well as tensions related to balancing adaptability with predictability and clashing attitudes toward training with AI. Future training must evolve to deepen understanding and trust between humans and AI, focusing on socio‐emotional bonds and role awareness to offer greater benefits for teaming. We conclude with three actionable recommendations for organizational research on training for HATs to expand these findings to broader contexts.

Journal of Organizational Behavior
University of Calgary (CA), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Rice University (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.