Machine learning vs. traditional logistic regression: predictive performance and risk factor identification for child nutritional outcome in Pakistan

Logistic regression (LR) has long been the standard econometric tool for modeling child nutritional outcomes in public health research. However, conventional econometric LR (CE-LR) faces limitations in predictive accuracy, reliance on restrictive assumptions, and handling high-dimensional data. Machine learning-enhanced LR (ML-LR)-which relaxes the strict statistical assumptions of traditional models to better capture complex patterns-combined with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), offers a promising alternative, improving both prediction and interpretability of risk factors. This study presents the first Pakistan-specific application and comparison of ML-LR (with SHAP analysis) against CE-LR, introducing a novel hybrid framework that combines predictive power with interpretability for policy-relevant insights using nationally representative data from Pakistan's 2017-2018 Demographic and Health Survey (n = 4,098 children under five). Results indicate persistent malnutrition rates: stunting (38.13%), underweight (23.04%), and wasting (8.05%). The ML-LR model identified all 13 hypothesized risk factors as significant, while CE-LR detected only six. Crucially, ML-LR captured key predictors missed by CE-LR, such as maternal BMI, employment, and dietary diversity. The SHAP analysis further revealed nuanced relationships: child age, low maternal BMI, unemployment, and unimproved water increased malnutrition risk, while higher birth order, adequate dietary diversity (if children were given ≥ 5 food items), maternal education, and male gender had protective effects. Crucially, ML-LR + SHAP uncovered context-dependent relationships invisible to CE-LR. For example, dietary diversity operated bidirectionally-low diversity was a risk factor, while adequate diversity was protective-a distinction CE-LR failed to capture. These findings demonstrate ML-LR's superior ability to model complex, heterogeneous determinants of child malnutrition. The study advocates for integrating ML techniques with explainable AI (e.g., SHAP) in econometric analyses to enhance policy-relevant insights in public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25621-9
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning vs. traditional logistic regression: predictive performance and risk factor identification for child nutritional outcome in Pakistan

Hafiz Muhammad Naveed, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Shahid, Serhat Yüksel et al.
BMC Public Health
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Machine learning vs. traditional logistic regression: predictive performance and risk factor identification for child nutritional outcome in Pakistan

Hafiz Muhammad Naveed, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Shahid, Serhat Yüksel, Hasan Dınçer, Jiayi Song, Muhammad Yahya
article en

Abstract

Logistic regression (LR) has long been the standard econometric tool for modeling child nutritional outcomes in public health research. However, conventional econometric LR (CE-LR) faces limitations in predictive accuracy, reliance on restrictive assumptions, and handling high-dimensional data. Machine learning-enhanced LR (ML-LR)-which relaxes the strict statistical assumptions of traditional models to better capture complex patterns-combined with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), offers a promising alternative, improving both prediction and interpretability of risk factors. This study presents the first Pakistan-specific application and comparison of ML-LR (with SHAP analysis) against CE-LR, introducing a novel hybrid framework that combines predictive power with interpretability for policy-relevant insights using nationally representative data from Pakistan's 2017-2018 Demographic and Health Survey (n = 4,098 children under five). Results indicate persistent malnutrition rates: stunting (38.13%), underweight (23.04%), and wasting (8.05%). The ML-LR model identified all 13 hypothesized risk factors as significant, while CE-LR detected only six. Crucially, ML-LR captured key predictors missed by CE-LR, such as maternal BMI, employment, and dietary diversity. The SHAP analysis further revealed nuanced relationships: child age, low maternal BMI, unemployment, and unimproved water increased malnutrition risk, while higher birth order, adequate dietary diversity (if children were given ≥ 5 food items), maternal education, and male gender had protective effects. Crucially, ML-LR + SHAP uncovered context-dependent relationships invisible to CE-LR. For example, dietary diversity operated bidirectionally-low diversity was a risk factor, while adequate diversity was protective-a distinction CE-LR failed to capture. These findings demonstrate ML-LR's superior ability to model complex, heterogeneous determinants of child malnutrition. The study advocates for integrating ML techniques with explainable AI (e.g., SHAP) in econometric analyses to enhance policy-relevant insights in public health.

BMC Public HealthVol. 26(1)
Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK), Shenzhen University (CN), Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Al Madinah International University (MY), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.