Silence of the archives redux

This reflective essay revisits my 2013 article, ‘The Silence of the Archives,’ to explore its origins, reception, and continuing relevance for management and organizational history. I discuss the epistemic and methodological debates that shaped the original piece, including historiographical traditions, postcolonial theory, and the challenges of interdisciplinary engagement. The essay considers the ‘after-history’ of the article, particularly in light of digitization, oral history, and the rise of born-digital sources, and reflects on how these developments intersect with enduring archival silences. By situating archival research within broader conversations on reflexivity, narrative construction, and historical imagination, I argue for a more critical and inclusive approach to historical methods in management and organization studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management & Organizational History
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2025.2595970
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silence of the archives redux

Stephanie Decker
2 citations
Management & Organizational History
Management and Organizational Studies
5.53
article

Silence of the archives redux

Stephanie Decker
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This reflective essay revisits my 2013 article, ‘The Silence of the Archives,’ to explore its origins, reception, and continuing relevance for management and organizational history. I discuss the epistemic and methodological debates that shaped the original piece, including historiographical traditions, postcolonial theory, and the challenges of interdisciplinary engagement. The essay considers the ‘after-history’ of the article, particularly in light of digitization, oral history, and the rise of born-digital sources, and reflects on how these developments intersect with enduring archival silences. By situating archival research within broader conversations on reflexivity, narrative construction, and historical imagination, I argue for a more critical and inclusive approach to historical methods in management and organization studies.

Management & Organizational HistoryVol. 21(1-2)
University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.