Climate change mitigation and green energy investment: A stock-flow consistent model

This paper develops a stock-flow consistent business cycle model integrating aggregate demand dynamics, income distribution, and ecological constraints to analyze climate mitigation strategies. We propose a two-sector framework distinguishing between energy and non-energy production. The model comprises wage and rent-earning households, firms in energy and non-energy sectors, a central bank, and commercial banks. Throughout the business cycle, energy sector firms gradually increase their share of green energy investment in the face of the low-carbon transition, replacing brown technologies with green alternatives. Through numerical simulations, we show that the pace of the energy transition influences both economic outcomes and emission trajectories. A negative shock to the green energy investment share – caused e.g. by policy inaction – not only slows the low-carbon transition but also depresses aggregate demand, wages, and employment. The paper examines possibilities for reducing the carbon intensity of production and provides insights into the interactions between ecological, macroeconomic, and distributive factors during the transition to a green economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108863
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate change mitigation and green energy investment: A stock-flow consistent model

Ettore Gallo, Gustavo Pereira Serra
1 citations
Ecological Economics
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
article

Climate change mitigation and green energy investment: A stock-flow consistent model

Ettore Gallo, Gustavo Pereira Serra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper develops a stock-flow consistent business cycle model integrating aggregate demand dynamics, income distribution, and ecological constraints to analyze climate mitigation strategies. We propose a two-sector framework distinguishing between energy and non-energy production. The model comprises wage and rent-earning households, firms in energy and non-energy sectors, a central bank, and commercial banks. Throughout the business cycle, energy sector firms gradually increase their share of green energy investment in the face of the low-carbon transition, replacing brown technologies with green alternatives. Through numerical simulations, we show that the pace of the energy transition influences both economic outcomes and emission trajectories. A negative shock to the green energy investment share – caused e.g. by policy inaction – not only slows the low-carbon transition but also depresses aggregate demand, wages, and employment. The paper examines possibilities for reducing the carbon intensity of production and provides insights into the interactions between ecological, macroeconomic, and distributive factors during the transition to a green economy.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 241
University of Parma (IT), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.