Paths to innovation ecosystem robustness: An fsQCA of structural and relational conditions in Dutch healthcare innovation ecosystems

Innovation ecosystems must be robust to withstand internal disruptions. Ecosystem orchestrators can shape robustness through structural and relational governance mechanisms, yet little is known about how they interact. This study explores governance configurations conducive to internal robustness in Dutch healthcare innovation ecosystems. Drawing on 27 orchestrator interviews and a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), we identify three archetypal pathways: Structured Collaboration, Coordinated Trust, and Directed Autonomy. Across all pathways, value capture emerged as a necessary condition for sustaining engagement. The findings extend emerging literature on ecosystem robustness by demonstrating equifinality and substitution logics: robustness can be achieved through multiple, context-dependent governance designs. We contribute a typology of governance archetypes, linking maturity stages, trust dynamics, and governance mechanisms, offering both theoretical insights and practical guidance for orchestrators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115855
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paths to innovation ecosystem robustness: An fsQCA of structural and relational conditions in Dutch healthcare innovation ecosystems

Nadine Roijakkers, Ard‐Pieter de Man, Ward Ooms, Dieudonnee Cobben
Journal of Business Research
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Paths to innovation ecosystem robustness: An fsQCA of structural and relational conditions in Dutch healthcare innovation ecosystems

Nadine Roijakkers, Ard‐Pieter de Man, Ward Ooms, Dieudonnee Cobben
article en

Abstract

Innovation ecosystems must be robust to withstand internal disruptions. Ecosystem orchestrators can shape robustness through structural and relational governance mechanisms, yet little is known about how they interact. This study explores governance configurations conducive to internal robustness in Dutch healthcare innovation ecosystems. Drawing on 27 orchestrator interviews and a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), we identify three archetypal pathways: Structured Collaboration, Coordinated Trust, and Directed Autonomy. Across all pathways, value capture emerged as a necessary condition for sustaining engagement. The findings extend emerging literature on ecosystem robustness by demonstrating equifinality and substitution logics: robustness can be achieved through multiple, context-dependent governance designs. We contribute a typology of governance archetypes, linking maturity stages, trust dynamics, and governance mechanisms, offering both theoretical insights and practical guidance for orchestrators.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 204
Open University of the Netherlands (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.