Privacy‐Preserving Hierarchical Federated Learning With Front‐Loaded Differential Privacy Mechanism

ABSTRACT Differential privacy is a widely recognized approach for enhancing privacy in federated learning by preventing sensitive information leakage during model training and deployment. These mechanisms typically bound the sensitivity of model updates through gradient or model parameter clipping, followed by noise injection to achieve formal privacy guarantees. However, achieving stronger privacy guarantees necessitates more noise, which can adversely impact model utility. Although various clipping and noise‐adding mechanisms have been explored in client‐level differential privacy, their comparative effectiveness within hierarchical federated learning remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by systematically evaluating three primary clipping and noise‐adding approaches within a three‐tier hierarchical federated learning framework. The evaluation was conducted using two distinct neural networks trained on federated datasets derived from benchmark datasets. Each mechanism was assessed under three different noise levels, with performance measured by test accuracy and convergence behavior across global rounds. The results indicate that front‐loaded differential privacy mechanisms, such as clipping gradients and adding noise to either the clipped gradients or model parameters, achieve better convergence and model utility across varying noise scales and data distributions than the approach based on clipping and perturbing model parameter differences. These findings are particularly relevant to real‐world applications in privacy‐sensitive hierarchical settings, such as edge computing in healthcare and finance, where balancing privacy and utility is essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.70411
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privacy‐Preserving Hierarchical Federated Learning With Front‐Loaded Differential Privacy Mechanism

Hashan Ratnayake, Xiaofeng Ding, Lin Chen
Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Privacy‐Preserving Hierarchical Federated Learning With Front‐Loaded Differential Privacy Mechanism

Hashan Ratnayake, Xiaofeng Ding, Lin Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Differential privacy is a widely recognized approach for enhancing privacy in federated learning by preventing sensitive information leakage during model training and deployment. These mechanisms typically bound the sensitivity of model updates through gradient or model parameter clipping, followed by noise injection to achieve formal privacy guarantees. However, achieving stronger privacy guarantees necessitates more noise, which can adversely impact model utility. Although various clipping and noise‐adding mechanisms have been explored in client‐level differential privacy, their comparative effectiveness within hierarchical federated learning remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by systematically evaluating three primary clipping and noise‐adding approaches within a three‐tier hierarchical federated learning framework. The evaluation was conducted using two distinct neural networks trained on federated datasets derived from benchmark datasets. Each mechanism was assessed under three different noise levels, with performance measured by test accuracy and convergence behavior across global rounds. The results indicate that front‐loaded differential privacy mechanisms, such as clipping gradients and adding noise to either the clipped gradients or model parameters, achieve better convergence and model utility across varying noise scales and data distributions than the approach based on clipping and perturbing model parameter differences. These findings are particularly relevant to real‐world applications in privacy‐sensitive hierarchical settings, such as edge computing in healthcare and finance, where balancing privacy and utility is essential.

Concurrency and Computation Practice and ExperienceVol. 37(27-28)
Central China Normal University (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Privacy‐Preserving Hierarchical Federated Learning With Front‐Loaded Differential Privacy Mechanism — Hashan Ratnayake, Xiaofeng Ding, et al. · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS