What do we already have? Mapping asynchronous information literacy workshops to the <i>ACRL Framework</i> and companion documents

Purpose This study describes how librarians at an R1 institution developed a rapid process to understand the information literacy skills and concepts covered in a series of asynchronous online information literacy workshops. Because the workshops were originally designed and offered in an ad-hoc manner, this project was part of a larger assessment and revision effort to improve quality and make the workshops more cohesive. Design/methodology/approach Workshop reviewers streamlined mapping by focusing on knowledge practices from the ACRL Framework, providing the basis to understand frame coverage and gaps across all workshops. The reviewers strengthened map quality by including two Framework companion documents into the process to help fill in conceptual gaps in the original Framework. Findings The authors describe the mapping method developed and share recommended best practices for librarians who may need to assess rapidly the coverage of information literacy skills and concepts across multiple digital learning objects. The librarians learned that the Framework companion documents hold value to general information literacy work despite their implied disciplinary nature. Originality/value This study provides librarians the means to understand the coverage of information literacy concepts across asynchronous digital learning objects which may have been created individually and without a specific plan. The authors make a case for including Framework companion documents into the process and focusing on Framework knowledge practices to create the map, bringing more originality to the paper.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reference Services Review
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rsr-08-2025-0060
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What do we already have? Mapping asynchronous information literacy workshops to the ACRL Framework and companion documents

Carl O. DiNardo, Susan Ariew, Stephanie Jacobs
Reference Services Review
Library Science and Information Literacy
article

What do we already have? Mapping asynchronous information literacy workshops to the ACRL Framework and companion documents

Carl O. DiNardo, Susan Ariew, Stephanie Jacobs
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study describes how librarians at an R1 institution developed a rapid process to understand the information literacy skills and concepts covered in a series of asynchronous online information literacy workshops. Because the workshops were originally designed and offered in an ad-hoc manner, this project was part of a larger assessment and revision effort to improve quality and make the workshops more cohesive. Design/methodology/approach Workshop reviewers streamlined mapping by focusing on knowledge practices from the ACRL Framework, providing the basis to understand frame coverage and gaps across all workshops. The reviewers strengthened map quality by including two Framework companion documents into the process to help fill in conceptual gaps in the original Framework. Findings The authors describe the mapping method developed and share recommended best practices for librarians who may need to assess rapidly the coverage of information literacy skills and concepts across multiple digital learning objects. The librarians learned that the Framework companion documents hold value to general information literacy work despite their implied disciplinary nature. Originality/value This study provides librarians the means to understand the coverage of information literacy concepts across asynchronous digital learning objects which may have been created individually and without a specific plan. The authors make a case for including Framework companion documents into the process and focusing on Framework knowledge practices to create the map, bringing more originality to the paper.

Reference Services ReviewVol. 54(1)
University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Library Science and Information Literacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.