Beyond the racialised Islamophobic narrative: Muslim identity as a protective factor against radicalisation

This paper’s primary contribution is an evidence-based critique of European securitisation policy, founded on the flawed premise that Muslim identity is a risk factor for political violence. Our multinational, mixed-methods study (415 interviews; 5268 surveys) demonstrates this premise is empirically fallacious. The study’s most significant finding is that a strong Muslim identity is a protective factor, reducing the odds of supporting violence in response to repeated humiliation by 78.4%. We argue that policy preoccupation with religion has created a dangerous blind spot. The real driver is structural racism, which fosters alienation through “racialised disposability”. By misdiagnosing the problem, current policies are not only ineffective but actively iatrogenic, harming community resilience and inadvertently creating the very conditions they claim to prevent. This paper provides the empirical foundation for a necessary paradigm shift, arguing that effective policy must move from securitising identity towards a comprehensive anti-racism agenda that fosters genuine social inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251395992
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the racialised Islamophobic narrative: Muslim identity as a protective factor against radicalisation

Tahir Abbas
Critical Sociology
Global Security and Public Health
article

Beyond the racialised Islamophobic narrative: Muslim identity as a protective factor against radicalisation

Tahir Abbas
article en

Abstract

This paper’s primary contribution is an evidence-based critique of European securitisation policy, founded on the flawed premise that Muslim identity is a risk factor for political violence. Our multinational, mixed-methods study (415 interviews; 5268 surveys) demonstrates this premise is empirically fallacious. The study’s most significant finding is that a strong Muslim identity is a protective factor, reducing the odds of supporting violence in response to repeated humiliation by 78.4%. We argue that policy preoccupation with religion has created a dangerous blind spot. The real driver is structural racism, which fosters alienation through “racialised disposability”. By misdiagnosing the problem, current policies are not only ineffective but actively iatrogenic, harming community resilience and inadvertently creating the very conditions they claim to prevent. This paper provides the empirical foundation for a necessary paradigm shift, arguing that effective policy must move from securitising identity towards a comprehensive anti-racism agenda that fosters genuine social inclusion.

Critical Sociology
Aston University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.