The Convention on the Rights of the Child and its conception of childhood

Discussions about the Convention on the Rights of the Child are often excessively legalistic. This obscures the possibility for a deeper engagement with the text of the Convention to identify its underlying values and conception of childhood. This paper engages with this less chartered terrain. It first traces the shift from an instrumentalist, to a welfarist, to a rights-based conception of childhood. Next, it explores the discrete features of this rights based conception of childhood under the Convention which is shown to recognise and accommodate both children’s vulnerabilities and evolving capacities while also challenging traditional systems that silence and marginalise children. Finally, it addresses some of the enduring and emerging concerns with the idea of children’s rights – that it is divisive, grounded in western values and incapable of accommodating non-human ecological concerns – to reveal a more dynamic, relational and accommodating conception of childhood than is often assumed to be the case under a rights-based approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Studies of Childhood
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20436106251387809
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Convention on the Rights of the Child and its conception of childhood

John Tobin
Global Studies of Childhood
Children's Rights and Participation
article

The Convention on the Rights of the Child and its conception of childhood

John Tobin
article en

Abstract

Discussions about the Convention on the Rights of the Child are often excessively legalistic. This obscures the possibility for a deeper engagement with the text of the Convention to identify its underlying values and conception of childhood. This paper engages with this less chartered terrain. It first traces the shift from an instrumentalist, to a welfarist, to a rights-based conception of childhood. Next, it explores the discrete features of this rights based conception of childhood under the Convention which is shown to recognise and accommodate both children’s vulnerabilities and evolving capacities while also challenging traditional systems that silence and marginalise children. Finally, it addresses some of the enduring and emerging concerns with the idea of children’s rights – that it is divisive, grounded in western values and incapable of accommodating non-human ecological concerns – to reveal a more dynamic, relational and accommodating conception of childhood than is often assumed to be the case under a rights-based approach.

Global Studies of ChildhoodVol. 16(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.